<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Laptop Per Child&#8230; Possible?</title>
	<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DOH</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17744</link>
		<dc:creator>DOH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17744</guid>
		<description>According to the report, China has the largest number of Internet users, but the percent of the population is still small. The Internet is still unheard of in rural China where most people live.
http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/gyzg/t231597.htm  
On the contrary, it’s very interesting to note that certain web sites are blocked by the Chinese government. However, many Internet users manage to access blocked web sites using foreign proxy servers. I am not sure if they are required to register in order to access the Interent.  Anyone knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the report, China has the largest number of Internet users, but the percent of the population is still small. The Internet is still unheard of in rural China where most people live.<br />
<a href="http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/gyzg/t231597.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/gyzg/t231597.htm</a><br />
On the contrary, it’s very interesting to note that certain web sites are blocked by the Chinese government. However, many Internet users manage to access blocked web sites using foreign proxy servers. I am not sure if they are required to register in order to access the Interent.  Anyone knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17722</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Lockhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17722</guid>
		<description>RLM: Losing our jobs wasn't a serious point with me. But...

Actually, French is spoken in much of Africa as well. French jobs could be offshored there. Not to mention work from nearby English speaking countries (the UK, S. Afr and even India). As Friedman's book tells us, the world is getting flat. Commerce isn't necessarily restricted to an arm's reach... but Africa still lags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RLM: Losing our jobs wasn&#8217;t a serious point with me. But&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually, French is spoken in much of Africa as well. French jobs could be offshored there. Not to mention work from nearby English speaking countries (the UK, S. Afr and even India). As Friedman&#8217;s book tells us, the world is getting flat. Commerce isn&#8217;t necessarily restricted to an arm&#8217;s reach&#8230; but Africa still lags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17718</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Lockhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17718</guid>
		<description>Hochgesang: I said sorry for not getting the stats stat... "stat" being ER-speak for ASAP. That's what I get for being punny but not funny.

China?: I had the same reaction. Am also wondering about India, also with a population of one billion. Maybe we aren't realizing how agricultural much of China still is? Either that or 6.8% is flat-out wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hochgesang: I said sorry for not getting the stats stat&#8230; &#8220;stat&#8221; being ER-speak for ASAP. That&#8217;s what I get for being punny but not funny.</p>
<p>China?: I had the same reaction. Am also wondering about India, also with a population of one billion. Maybe we aren&#8217;t realizing how agricultural much of China still is? Either that or 6.8% is flat-out wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China?</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17702</link>
		<dc:creator>China?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17702</guid>
		<description>Wait, Internet usage in China, is only at 6.8%? That number just seems...wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, Internet usage in China, is only at 6.8%? That number just seems&#8230;wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie hochgesang</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17679</link>
		<dc:creator>julie hochgesang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17679</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Glenn, for the informative (and not so subtle, haha) stats (stat, whatever). I was actually looking for how many people in the world had access to computers themselves, not just the internet. Although I already know the difficulties of ascertaining such figures...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Glenn, for the informative (and not so subtle, haha) stats (stat, whatever). I was actually looking for how many people in the world had access to computers themselves, not just the internet. Although I already know the difficulties of ascertaining such figures&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17637</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17637</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. The way I read it is that you saying you don't want OLPC to go ahead because it might threaten US jobs. You also appear to be saying that introduction of technology will is in danger of "ruining their lives".

If in a few years OLPC target countries develop competitive high-tech industries as a result of this technology, how will it have ruined lives? 

If the project fails, lives may not be ruined, necessarily, but expectation will have been dashed - which is never a good project outcome. However, if this failure occurs, your fears about US jobs being lost to these countries would be baseless. 

I could be misreading you here, but you appear to be arguing both sides of the coin here. 

Would you care to clarify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand what you are saying. The way I read it is that you saying you don&#8217;t want OLPC to go ahead because it might threaten US jobs. You also appear to be saying that introduction of technology will is in danger of &#8220;ruining their lives&#8221;.</p>
<p>If in a few years OLPC target countries develop competitive high-tech industries as a result of this technology, how will it have ruined lives? </p>
<p>If the project fails, lives may not be ruined, necessarily, but expectation will have been dashed - which is never a good project outcome. However, if this failure occurs, your fears about US jobs being lost to these countries would be baseless. </p>
<p>I could be misreading you here, but you appear to be arguing both sides of the coin here. </p>
<p>Would you care to clarify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17634</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Lockhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17634</guid>
		<description>Ah, then I don't have to explain why I didn't come up with the stats... um, stat. As in ASAP. Graduate students, unite!!

Although you asked for access to computers, am assuming you as much meant Internet access? If so...

http://www.pewinternet.org/ ... their reports usually feature penetration numbers (please, people)... Internet, digital TVs, cell phone usage, etc etc.

According to http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/182/report_display.asp:
-73% of Americans (about 147 million adults) are Internet users 
-42% of Americans are with broadband connectivity

(But don't read too much into that. Who knows how many use the Web just to access email.)

Another source (xerox from a 2005 report, don't know name) gives Internet penetration in eight countries as:
- France: 40.6%
- Sweden: 74.6%
- UK: 58.5%
- USA: 68.8%
- Mexico: 11.9%
- China: 6.8%
- Ghana: 0.8%
- Lebanon: 2.3%

Needs more penetration, folks. More.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, then I don&#8217;t have to explain why I didn&#8217;t come up with the stats&#8230; um, stat. As in ASAP. Graduate students, unite!!</p>
<p>Although you asked for access to computers, am assuming you as much meant Internet access? If so&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pewinternet.org/</a> &#8230; their reports usually feature penetration numbers (please, people)&#8230; Internet, digital TVs, cell phone usage, etc etc.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/182/report_display.asp:" rel="nofollow">http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF.....splay.asp:</a><br />
-73% of Americans (about 147 million adults) are Internet users<br />
-42% of Americans are with broadband connectivity</p>
<p>(But don&#8217;t read too much into that. Who knows how many use the Web just to access email.)</p>
<p>Another source (xerox from a 2005 report, don&#8217;t know name) gives Internet penetration in eight countries as:<br />
- France: 40.6%<br />
- Sweden: 74.6%<br />
- UK: 58.5%<br />
- USA: 68.8%<br />
- Mexico: 11.9%<br />
- China: 6.8%<br />
- Ghana: 0.8%<br />
- Lebanon: 2.3%</p>
<p>Needs more penetration, folks. More.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie hochgesang</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17600</link>
		<dc:creator>julie hochgesang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17600</guid>
		<description>David explains it very well. But I will add a cute little anecdote. The kids at the school I taught at didn't know what digital cameras were. But after the first day we used them, they knew immediately to ask for looking at the back of the camera where the little screen was. They got a kick out of seeing themselves in this tiny little metallic box.  When they saw another camera we had (an older manual one), they said SORRY CAMERA YOUR BROKEN. 

Kids, really humans, are amazingly adept at using tools and adapting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David explains it very well. But I will add a cute little anecdote. The kids at the school I taught at didn&#8217;t know what digital cameras were. But after the first day we used them, they knew immediately to ask for looking at the back of the camera where the little screen was. They got a kick out of seeing themselves in this tiny little metallic box.  When they saw another camera we had (an older manual one), they said SORRY CAMERA YOUR BROKEN. </p>
<p>Kids, really humans, are amazingly adept at using tools and adapting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie hochgesang</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17598</link>
		<dc:creator>julie hochgesang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17598</guid>
		<description>(meaning that i don't have time to look further - not that i'm inept at research!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(meaning that i don&#8217;t have time to look further - not that i&#8217;m inept at research!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie hochgesang</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17597</link>
		<dc:creator>julie hochgesang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/julie-hochgesang/2006-09-16/one-laptop-per-child-possible/#comment-17597</guid>
		<description>Did you find the information? I looked quickly but couldn't find it quickly enough. I am a graduate student after all... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you find the information? I looked quickly but couldn&#8217;t find it quickly enough. I am a graduate student after all&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
