Danger Much, Will Robinson?
or, Why I Won’t get a Gmail Account:
Privacy in the Information Age
By
Josh Allmann on Fri 13 Jul 2007 |
Email This Post
Imagine a typical day — you take the Metro to and from work. You go out to lunch, then maybe run a few errands in the evening, and call people during the day. You swipe your SmarTrip card in and out, and use the Visa for most of your purchases. All throughout the day, you’re leaving clues about your actions and whereabouts. Metrorail knows precisely when and where you get off the train. Your bank can track your location and buying patterns by looking at your purchase history, and the phone company knows who you called, from where, and for how long.
All that is a given — but here’s what should be slightly scary. What do you do at the office all day? Seeing that some people spend more time with MS Word than their spouse, I’m going to assume you’re a heavy Internet user. Now, take a look at some of the more revealing keywords searched for by AOL users. (last year, AOL ‘mistakenly’ released about 2GB worth of queries, all keyed to user ID#s). Some are funny, some are disturbing, and some reveal things that you should not know (warning: not for the easily offended).
Now, these days AOL is only a marginal service with a steadily dwindling subscriber base. How many of you enjoy sharing pictures on flickr, bookmarks on del.icio.us, or use a service from Yahoo, such as news, games or horoscopes? You guessed it — they’re all owned by Yahoo. They’re tracking you.
Take Google — everybody’s beloved, do-no-evil Internet titan. They’ve already come under scrutiny for the amount of user information they collect — and now they want to index your home. Taking my tongue out of my cheek, I google a couple dozen times daily from the Firefox search toolbar. Google Finance is too sexy to live without. I get an increasing amount of tech information (documentation, howtos, etc) from Google Groups. How many of you rely on Google Maps (yay! Google knows where you live), or Gmail (adsense is not magic — they actively sniff your email to serve up contextual ads)?
It may not seem like much at first glance, but all those bits and pieces of correlated user data add up very, very quickly. I’d wager the Internet knows more about you than you do yourself.
Don’t think this information is private to the purveyors of the Internet either — some of the big buzzwords of Web 2.0 are ‘collaboration’ and ’sharing.’ In other words, you’re encouraged to be open and social. Being able to mine someone’s del.icio.us account can tell you a lot about the person, and it’s almost all open to the public. Facebook users should know the dangers of too many incriminating pictures in public. (Remember last year’s uproar over the Facebook news feed?) Sometimes unintentionally public information can be put to sinister uses — you can search for valid credit-card numbers.
All the major Internet players have said they’re very careful about safeguarding user data. I believe them for the most part — what else am I going to do? The Web and Josh Allmann are hopelessly intertwined. I like to think I’m hedging my privacy bets somewhat by using different services — I download email, ad-free, directly to my desktop client. I use Live Local for my mapping needs. (I’m still waiting for drag-and-drop rerouting… hurry up, Microsoft!) I use Yahoo for, uh, horoscopes and stuff. But the reality is, the landscape of the Web is changing before our very eyes — information disclosure is something we’re going to have to get used to.
I do admit — were I in these companies’ shoes, I would have an Orwellian curiosity about that ream of information in my hands. The aggregate statistics coming out of it would be very interesting, at the very least. I’d like to know what they are!
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.
8 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.




Mmm. I’ve thought about this topic too. The problem is that Google requires a Gmail account for so many things, such as use of Blogger/access to private Blogger accounts, and other aspects of their service. I personally have a Gmail account, but I don’t use it except to provide myself access to the services I want/need. My personal e-mail does not go to Gmail at all. I think you’ve got it right - diversify so all of your info isn’t conveniently lumped together in one or two places.
True, but personal information is only a part of the equation. Google has exactly what it wants — your usage of Google services such as Blogger and Gmail, and along with that, your usage and browsing habits, among other things. (Got personal info on Blogger?) Everybody is leaving a massive virtual paper-trail everywhere they go. I’m not necessarily saying that’s a bad thing; I’ve long resigned myself to the care of our dot-com overlords.
Oh, yup. They don’t have my browsing habits since it’s not on my toolbar at all and I don’t use Google’s search feature. But I freely acknowledge and concede your point that they’ve got some of my info, yeah. *I* personally think that’s a bad thing, but all we can do is continue to press our legislators for privacy rights laws. I’m fortunate that I’m in California, where state law on privacy rights is much more rigorous than federal law.
“I’d wager the Internet knows more about you than you do yourself.”
Heh, how soon will we be able to type in a question, say…”What should I buy my wife for our anniversary?” and have our personal searches, purchases, and other habits analyzed then the search engine produces a list of suggestions?
The future may be closer than you think. Read this article by our favorite polemicist, and wet your pants. Or maybe not.
Heh. How soon before as soon as you start typing on the keyboard, before the NSA comes up with a search warrant and you’re dragged off to jail before you can complete your Google query in a complex operation reminiscent of the scene in “Brazil,” where they’re looking for Harry Tuttle.
It’s already happening. MySpace has been subpoenaed by the federal government for information on registered sex offenders. (Citation!)
If you look at some of the AOL queries I linked to above, there are some pretty sick people out there, and with this kind of information, the government would have plenty of ammunition to use against sickos. Or whoever else they please.
Excuse me, in Brazil, the government was looking for Harry Tuttle, but a mistyped warrant had them looking for Harry Buttle who was hauled off in a Black Maria in the middle of the night.
As for your concerns about the government’s surveillance of your Internet use, I’d say that they are well-founded. Our government appears not to understand that — not following the law or following procedures to safeguard citizen rights in an unending anti-terrorist quest — this all degrades our independence and liberty from the government. What one administration has done can also be extended further — this is known as the slippery slope.
But then again, the erosion of privacy and liberty on the Internet is also done by corporations and Google’s Gmail is simply one of the more egregious violators (although you do have to actually sign up for it). Further, your employer (including mine) restricts the right of employees to read, post, and go on the Internet during work-hours. Erosion of privacy? Court cases have held not.
In short, you’re right, there’s plenty of things to be concerned about over your use of the Internet.