By Hilary Franklin
In this golden age of visual media, where we all communicate with one another (silently) via instant messaging, e-mail, blogs and vlogs, videophone, paper and pencil, and yes, even TTYs sometimes,
Why, oh WHY does the emphasis still have to be on silence whenever the news media picks up on an issue that relates somehow to deafness?
Take the recent media storm surrounding the new Pepsi ad featuring a well-known deaf joke. Though it will not be shown live until the day of the Super Bowl, the ad can already be viewed online. The media has picked up on this with a great fervor, and to my dismay, the majority of news outlets (both television and newspaper) have chosen headlines that include some form of the word “silent.”
- Pepsi hopes silence is golden with Super Bowl ad - USATODAY.com
- Deaf PepsiCo workers to star in silent Super Bowl ad
- Pepsi’s New Super Bowl Commercial: Silence
- Pepsi ad to give Super Bowl viewers a moment of silence
- PepsiCo Super Bowl commercial breaks the cacophony with 60 seconds of total silence
- PepsiCo Super Bowl ad features silence
But the most ironic one of all?
The juxtaposition of “silent” and “resonate” had me shaking my head.
I know I don’t like clichés, but this just seems so over the top. Of course, what else would they say? How about focusing on the use of ASL rather than the lack of sound?
By the way, I will grant that the lack of audio in this 60-second commercial will definitely have people going “wha…?!” But still.
What do YOU think?
Hilary Franklin is a politically incorrect writer. By day she masquerades as a technical writer in an educational research firm. She has come to the conclusion that everything she learned, she did indeed learn in kindergarten.
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.
23 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



I agree with you, Hilary - I don’t like cliches either, nor stereotypes, which those headlines are. Does it seem to you like those media writers don’t have any original thoughts? If I was a reporter, I’d try something like:
Pepsi celebrates cultural and language diversity in Super Bowl ad
Pepsi scores a touchdown with humorous ASL ad
Pepsi: Honk if you love ASL
Wouldn’t it be nice if being deaf and using ASL was no longer considered “disabled” or “different,” but simply a colorful thread in the tapestry that is diverse America?
I think you’re wrong. It’s a good idea sometimes to show somebody what life is like from someone else’s perspective.
I think Pepsi did the ad in good taste (pun intended).
You can’t stop the media from using a “play on words” in their headlines. That’s what they like to do. Those headline writers get bored and they think they are being clever.
I’m not dissing the commercial — I think the commercial is pretty funny. I know I laughed at it (though the honking all the way down the street is pretty unrealistic in this day and age).
As far as headline writing goes, wouldn’t you think that after seeing the first 4 or 5 pop up online, that writers would try for a different angle? I dunno. I used to be a headline writer and always tried to make my headlines creative and non-clichéd. But that’s just me. :)
[…] is always a however isn’t there? However, I have to agree with Hilary Franklin in her post, Noisy Media Capitalizes on Silence, about the print and internet media falling into cliches to make to talk up this […]
In a way, I think that this commercial makes deaf people look inconsiderate. I would NEVER honk my horn up and down a street. I know it’s a joke…but still it’s the principle.
Just watched the ad and found it totally unrealistic - what are the odds these days of two Deaf people going about without either of them having a sidekick or blackberry? Please.
Maybe the house they’re looking for is situated in the “no coverage” area? Gotta love those X’s :)
the joke first came around during the time the tty was just as big as a household fridge or as early as grunting was the first language.
Hilary made a valid point and they are worth thinking about in light of society’s’ greater awareness about deaf individuals. Yet, the readers’ comments make it sound like we should be arguing that they should have focused on the use of ASL rather than silence.
I disagree with “Curious Eyes”. It’s the absence of sound that should unite us all together. Not American Sign Language. Believe it or not, not many hearing people know what ASL means and what it represents to us. Further, many of them really don’t care other than saying, “I think ASL is beautiful”. What they do understand is that deaf people can’t hear and that is what the media is drawing its observation from.
I agree with “Deep Ears”. I thought this commercial was beautiful. Was it realistic? Not completely but take a look at a sampling at any of the commercials. None of them are wholly realistic. Did it portray the deaf actors as being rude? On the contrary, it showed them thinking out of the box when faced with a seemly insurmountable problem. Finally, it’s not in dispute that the commercial was hilarious.
For once: let’s stop nitpicking. We saw something totally cool and neat.
Hi Scott: I think you misunderstood. The commercial was really cool and I’m totally fine with it.
My beef was with the *media headlines* associating deafness with silence. Deaf people have various hearing levels, but we certainly are not silent or language-less, as anyone who has lived in a deaf dorm will know. The hearing community seems to think that all deaf people are totally, profoundly deaf, meaning we hear nothing at all. That’s very far from being the case. The media perpetuates that stereotypical, cliched view of deaf people. That’s the reason I gave some alternate headlines that emphasized language or cultural diversity instead of silence.
Good point about the term ASL. How about sign language instead? Aside from terminology, if PepsiCo was really, really smart, they’d hire someone like Dack Virnig to make a commercial about Pepsi like the movie he did about Mountain Dew. Now that was truly awesome, and definitely thinking outside the box!
You’re right about how the media “perpetuates that stereotypical, cliched view of deaf people” which was something Allen Neece, DeafDC.com guest blogger, picked up about a year ago in his “There They Go Again” blog. See http://www.deafdc.com/blog/gue.....go-again/.
I apologize for dumping my frustration on you. My concern was that it is not often that deaf individuals receive some sort of a national stage and while we all may not agree with the end result, it is still a noticeable achievement. Bottom line, it helps encourage the next generation of deaf individuals on becoming more confident in themselves and better yet: becoming a productive member of society as versus a well-known deaf blogger telling a young deaf child that she could never become a judge because she was born deaf.
Scott
While I agree that the media could do a better job in its characterization of anything relating to deafness, the headlines about this TV advertisement don’t perturb me. It’s all merely about a Pepsi advertisement — which is different from the LA Times article purporting to be sensitive and nuanced coverage about the CSD-R football team.
Now I’ll just go back to my silent world and drink some silent coffee while engaging in some silent writing on my silent computer in my silent office.
(By the way, can’t DeafDC.com/blog get Allen Neece to write again? His writing was phenomenal, even mesmerizing. Does his writing appear anywhere else?)
I don’t know about “phenomenal” or “mesmerizing” but you can work out your man-crush on Allen by starting a fan club. I’m sure Allen would be flattered by your evaluation of filmographic work in “Sorority Girls.”
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1145953/
Thanks, but no thanks.
I think the ideal solution to curing the screaming headlines of SILENCE! is to invite those headline writers to stay overnight at one of Gallaudet or RIT’s dorms. ;)
I agree, the silence thing gets dull quick. But that’s the only thing that the hearing understand about deafness. Deaf = silence to them. *shrugs* I’m not sure how we can combat that notion. Hopefully there will be more commercials that put ASL deaf on a national stage, and people will be focusing more on the ASL aspect than the medical aspect.
Deaf = Noisy! Hella yeah! ;-)
I think it is a good point about the media, and the entertainment industry too, always focusing on the supposed “silent” world of the deaf. As if all deaf people live in complete silence, which is not true. When many hearing people think of living in silence, their pity button gets pushed and they feel sorry for deaf people. I see this in movies and TV shows too, with a few exceptions.
It would be nice if people would focus on language (in this case, ASL, as is the purpose of the Pepsi commercial), rather than the misleading concept that the deaf live in silence.
In addition, the jokes told among cultural members are funny to its members because of shared values and experiences…we do run the risk now that hearing people might see this as Amos and Andy type of humor that they may few as funny, but for much different reasons than the ones that make deaf people laugh at the joke, which is the advantage deaf people have over hearing people in not being able to hear as well.
Still…is it a start? Better than nothing?? Maybe…just maybe.
That was supposed to be “that they may VIEW as funny…” not “FEW as funny” …. whoops …should have proof read better :(
I once attended a lecture by John Schulman, a Gallaudet professor who wrote a book, Deaf and Hollywood, IIRC about the title. he mentioned that silence movies in the 1920s and 1930s was how thet deaf community described the movies that time - since no one spoken. So silence can be a throwback to this era and today’s era. You know, hearing people also honked. Recently, a neighbor was fine because his son’s freind honked him and other neighbors filed complaints with the police….
Come on everyone, i think its hilarious. a different kind of perspective is always good. we can’t expect everything to be our way. make light out of it! laugh and enjoy!
After teaching ASL to hearies for several years, I can understand why the newspapers emphasize the word “silent.” Think about it: the commercial has NO sound. That will be the FIRST thing that hearies will notice, even before noticing the sign language in the commercial. That itself is a diversion of the “noisy” world they live in. For us deafies, the first thing we notice, of course, is the sign language. It’s simply the fact of life. Let us just accept that and move on. ;)
As for the commercial itself, it reminded me of the hotel Deaf joke…which was funnier than the commercial, to me anyway. The commercial was so unrealistic, first with the honking of the horn in a neighborhood but worst of all, the lights were off at the Deafie’s house??? All Deaf gatherings that I have attended and hosted have lights BLAZING from the house with numerous cars parked in the driveway and/or street. That’s how I’ve found some of those gatherings I’ve attended.
Ananke, sorry but I’m one of those Deafies without a pager. We are the rare but proud few. ;)
Y’know, some deaf people capitalize on “silence” as well, case in point, “Silent Seed”:
http://www.gloucestertimes.com.....14623.html
Some deaf sports teams use the word “Silent” in their team names too.
Not to mention the old “Silent News” deaf newspaper.
Granted, it might be an outdated cliche these days, but we have to admit that the Deaf Community has been guilty of using the term ourselves.