By Glenn Lockhart
The newspaper, radio and TV are known as traditional media. In the language of mass media studies, the Internet is the new or converged media–nowadays it’s pretty much the newspaper, radio and television all together.
The great thing with mass media research is that humans and not technologies take center stage. Us, us, us. How we use a medium, for what reason, to what effect, when and how often, and so forth. However, the Internet truly has transformed interactivity within the mass media. We have so much… examples include live chats, message boards, vlogs, user-generated content (remember pictures and video from the London bombing?), and I feel obligated to mention podcasts. And we all love blogs.
Mass media scholarship has served up a slate of theories, but they all were developed in various stages of the age of the traditional media. With the converged media redefining communication, well, nobody ever said knowledge was ageless. I’m okay with Pluto being a “planetoid,” for example, and… truths change with the times, things fade out of relevance.
As for those theories with application that endure with the Internet, they could provide us with a foundation for introspection into the deaf blogosphere. I’ve cherry-picked a few below. Do share thoughts and observations on how some of them might relate to blogging, blog-reading or commenting behavior, yours or that of others:
- Gatekeeping. Media practitioners decide what information is shared with the public. In theory, this implies organizational bias in the newsroom but is valuable because including all the information there is would overwhelm us. The wrinkle found with blogs? The majority of bloggers have no editors and commenters often have unfettered participation.
It used to be that we’d fax news releases and hope the newspapers would carry it; first, a bewildered 20-year-old intern decides what news releases to keep and what gets junked, then the harried editor decides what actually gets covered and assigns it to a staff reporter strung out on coffee and cigarettes, who then makes a call or a visit and writes the story or simply ransacks the news release for material, then another editor decides where the article goes and has the headline writer slap something. The next day the editor curses under breath if other newspapers make a big deal of something else and decides right then that our news release doesn’t get extended coverage. No second day for us.
Gatekeeping might be dead. Instead of established institutions serving up two or three sides for our consumption, bloggers are giving us 36 sides. Take the Daphne Wright trial, there have been blogs not only discussing the murder charges against her but on whether she is being tried fairly, whether deaf people should ever face the death penalty, and whether she has the language proficiency to understand legalese. We’re being treated to dimensions of the trial the newspapers didn’t provide us with. Or, maybe we’re all gatekeepers?
- Uses and Gratifications. This theory views each of us as active seekers of benefits. We knowingly use deaf blogs in order to gain that certain something… gratifications swim in all directions, to the pleasant, the ordinary and the awful, but these gratifications are always deliberately sought.
Why do we sustain blogs? Some bloggers post on captioning and emerging technologies. Many have opined on “History Through Deaf Eyes” in the days following its PBS airing and on the portrayal of the deaf community in a recent episode of Law and Order (Det. Goren is one cool dude!). The most fascinating blogs I read in recent weeks were on deafblindness, in relation to dating and another in relation to driving. There’s a blog posting updates on state schools for the deaf across the land.
Some seek change: A blogger repeatedly issued challenges to the interim president of Gallaudet University with implorations of “Are you listening to me, Dr. Davila?” although that has stopped and a vlogger recently ripped into the president of the National Association of the Deaf (the video has been taken down). The validity of their posts aside, you have to wonder if they log as they would talk in person. Do any of us? Our use of blogs and vlogs is not accidental, and the gratification we seek is not serendipitous.
Bloggers aren’t the only ones seeking gratification. Readers, of which some post comments, do too. Gratifications make for an endless list: entertainment, intellectual stimulation, issue elucidation, community engagement, awareness, relationship maintenance, conceit, surrogate companionship, venting, control…
In my previous appearance on DeafDC.com I talked about deaf blogs on a grand scale, but at core, emotionally, what motivates each of us–as individuals–to sustain deaf blogs?
- Spiral of Silence. Picture a tornado; up high is the widest circle, which funnels into a dot (.) when it hits the ground. This is a model for the relationship between public dialogue and social acceptance. Found at top aren’t only topics that are safe but earn you points if you chime in; think of the bandwagon. However, at the eye are taboo and ostracism.
Last summer the resurgence of deafhood was at its zenith and, predictably, many blogged on it. That doesn’t cheapen each blog but merely goes to its uncontroversial nature. I also recall that it was a popular topic for an inaugural blog, which testified to its safety… talk about it and get moral support from every single visitor. The widest circle there is in the spiral of silence.
On the other hand, how about Julie Guberman on Gallaudet’s closure? Give her a hand; she came closer than any wizard would to saying “Voldemort,” although she didn’t post it over in Gally Net-L.
In my estimation, the only taboo I can think of is denouncement of ASL. Think of People Sign Language, she got mauled, and fast. What else? Hard of hearing persons who wish they had deaf parents? Deaf persons who wish they were hearing? CODAs who think their parents are grotesquely unfit?
The Spiral of Silence may have been upended since blogs allow for anonymity. We don’t always know who’s blogging or who’s commenting. What issues have been unearthed? What issues are we still mum about?
- Gerbner’s Mean World Index. Actually a byproduct of the Cultivation Theory, this 1980 study found that the more TV we watch, the more violent we believe society to be. The basis is that media representation and reality don’t reconcile. I deafly extrapolate that to suggest in respect to certain issues or events the more exposure we have to deaf blogs, the more negative our perception becomes.
Sen. John McCain, who represents my home state of Arizona, wouldn’t laugh at me as I admit this: I conjure visions of bedlam and scorched earth when thinking of Iraq. Just last week he was quoted in a Washington Post article, “Just as we read about all the negative events in Iraq the American people must be aware of the positive developments under this new plan, and the media has a responsibility to report all aspects of what is taking place.” Still, I envision people sitting curbside at a café then—the café is bombed into rubble and the hounds of hell are there.
Sen. McCain has ties to the most important, most heated deaf blog topic of the year: he served on the Board of Trustees at Gallaudet during the protests. From reading various blogs, don’t you sometimes get the feeling that there’s still a campus lockdown or that the mood remains simmering and nuclear? Just as with the articles on Iraq, these blogs on Gallaudet aren’t necessarily wrong, but their barrage has this ability to distort.
There was this movie named Innerspace with funnyman Martin Short back in the late1980s. The basic storyline was: Man shrinks himself, journeys inside someone else’s body, but the journey ends up also being into himself. I like to think that each time we write, read or comment on a blog, our computer is shrunk to size and takes a journey inside of us. Now, about each blog mentioned here? Communication is more about us than what we talk about.
Gatekeeping. Uses and Gratifications. Spiral of Silence. Gerbner’s Mean World Index.
I’ll stop now. What’s a blog without comments?
Glenn Lockhart guested on DeafDC.com a while back (click here to see his blog “Why We Need Deaf Blogs“) and this is his second blog. He is Deaf, and he is a friendly guy. Really.
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.
26 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.




This is kind of off the point, and yet at the same time it gives us a really poignant, funny and very real glimpse at how blogging has become such a part of our world these days…
On a recent episode of Law and Order SVU, Detective Stabler was having a bit of an argument with his adolescent daughter, in which he said to her that he may have to resort to reading her diary just to find out what she was up to, if she wasn’t going to start talking to him.
To which the daughter responded: “Daaaaaadddddddd… NOBODY keeps a diary any more! If you wanna know what kids are up to these days, just go to their blogsite.”
you betcha. I keep track of my students thru myspace. It’s a riot. altho I sometimes see stuff, as a teacher, I should not really know, but I operate on the principle, that if it’s on myspace, it stays there…
Apologies to Glenn for getting off topic here, but this brings up an interesting point…
I know it’s more prevalent amongst adolescents than with us adults (who hopefully know better), but I wish someone would get it thru these kids (and not so young kids) heads that when you write something and put it up on a blog… IT’S ON THE INTERNET, FOLKS. People can and will find it and read it. And they can and will form opinions about you based on what they do read on your blog.
As we move into an increasingly technical world, how many schools are teaching kids about the potential dangers of the internet? I know they are taking computer courses and learning how to build websites and all that jazz…but are we really clearly getting it across to these kids that while the internet can be a powerful and positive medium, it isn’t always such a safe and secure place?
I just had an argument the other night with this teenager in which I pointed out she had put up some “questionable” content on her blog that I’m not so sure she would want everyone to see (especially the adult authorities in her life!)
Her argument of course was that “nobody knows about my blog, nobody knows who I am or where I live, yadda yadda yadda.” And yet she’s gotten as many as 28 comments to a post, and has her name, picture, and state she resides in on her profile. Yeah…right.
I have a friend who is a high school business teacher, and to prove a point to his students, he spent a weekend hunting up their blog sites using just their names and some basic knowledge he has about them (that pretty much anyone might know) along with a little computer savvy. He then came into class and proceeded to tell a bunch of students things he had learned about them from their blog sites. Several of them were shocked, somewhat embarrassed, and perhaps even a bit angry. One girl remarked how CREEPY it was to have her own teacher looking up and reading stuff about her like this. To which he responded “but you don’t think it is creepy to have TOTAL STRANGERS looking up and reading this stuff??? Including possible sex offenders and internet predators?”
Needless to say, that shut them up!
(Again, my apologies for this comment, but frankly this subject does scare me a little. When I see some of the stuff these kids are putting up on their blog sites…you gotta wonder!)
Pshaw, no need to apologize. : )
Not entirely contributory to your thread but here we see Erin Casler talk about her own blogging why’s, and some of her stuff and public comments are very relevant. We might not know why teens have MySpace, but at least we know a little bit more about why we blog. And for a possibly humorous parallel, maybe the older folks think of us adult bloggers the same we think of MySpacers? It’s all uses and gratifications.
Nice use of cultivation theory. Do you know if Gerbner et al are now including blogs in their data? It’s amazing how much of our reality is constructed by tv, and it becomes an endless loop between us, media, and us again. I think the internet is an extension of that loop.
The Mean World index definitely applies to Delogs and Gally-Net.
What about framing? Framing theory is like, the sexiest theory in communications now. I’m using framing theory to examine coverage of the 2006 protests and I can’t believe how much has been done on framing since Entman’s seminal attempt to position it as a theoretical foundation for communications scholarship. It’s been twenty years or so and they still haven’t come up with a universal definition.
Nice job, Lockhart.
You got me, Gerbner gave updates on his Mean World Index findings for years, but I never checked them out and I don’t know if he still does. Will do on a rainy day!
—-
Description of the framing theory here.
Although the link above gives a simple enough description, admittedly, when reading papers on it, I don’t understand framing that well. Sometimes it’s semantics, sometimes it’s aspects that gets played up or down.
I’ll try with an example anyway: Take the Daphne Wright trail, on which I have no position whatsoever. I’ve all but forgotten that she’s being tried for murder. Way it has been framed for me is it’s the death row for her and the jury isn’t of her peers… as if she’s the victim here. Is she? That’s what the deaf blogs are telling me.
Glenn,
I enjoyed this blog. I agree with most of your points, except your claim that gatekeeping is dead.
Not necessarily. It is still alive, just through a different medium. The overwhelming amount of information on the Internet as well as the difficulty in searching for, and finding v/blogs has made the aggregator a powerful, and extremely useful, tool. The following statement was taken from the website that you link to, “The gatekeeper decides which information will go forward, and which will not.”
In the case of both gatekeepers, or aggregators, in the deaf blogosphere, one selects the stories that fits its perception of the “best” individual blogs while the other displays the most recent entries under the specific blog that it feels deserves a place on its website. Both are not wrong or “bad”, they’re just different ways of organizing and distributing information. But both have limitations, especially under the theory of gatekeeping. DeafDC.com is a gatekeeper as well. In our efforts to provide the best quality blogs we carefully select DeafDC.com bloggers.
Gatekeeping also touches on another subject that I’ve discussed before, bias. From the website on gatekeeping, “A wire service editor decides alone what news audiences will receive from another continent. The idea is that if the gatekeeper’s selections are biased, the readers’ understanding will therefore be a little biased.” For example, when a website selects Gallaudet, Language, Audism, Culture as its primary topics of focus, we can figure out what type of bias exists, yet we are still influenced by it. Having a bias is ok; however, when a website claims to be neutral and all-inclusive of any type of deaf or heard of hearing person while harboring biases, that can be misleading…and troubling.
Let me know if you still think gatekeeping is dead. I’m interested in continuing this discussion.
Gatekeeping is nonexistent in news blogging if you view it as an instrument for collective bias. That’s in presenting news, mind you. White males used to dominate the newsroom and it reflected in the news back then, during when the original gatekeeping study was conducted.
You’re right, DeafDC has at least one gatekeeper. He played lineman his freshman year at MSSD then left for faraway lands. Then this morning he edited my blog. : )
Aggregators and algorithms (such as the one Google News uses) are filters, yes, I’ll concede that. Gatekeeping still exists if you insist, but the checks and balances are gone. As long as we have search engines (and how long before Google adds a tab for blogs anyway?), we’re able to get news direct from bloggers, and you don’t edit all of them (their tragedy).
But are there gatekeepers around today? You bet, only they answer to their own biases.
Matt Drudge posts breaking news without editors… Ridor and Mishkazena are possibly the best known examples of deaf bloggers who post news; they have no editors. How do they decide what is news and what isn’t? Same way newspapers always have done, except the process is cut down to one person, which is why I asked “Or, maybe we’re all gatekeepers?” The “we” part comes in play when we comment and add to the content output.
I think the gate keeping has evolved to go both ways now. Both the blogger and the readers gatekeep it, so to speak. The blogger decides the topic, but the readers choose to read it or not, and if the blogger doesn’t get a lot of hits, they eventually stop blogging. Why keep on blogging if nobody’s looking at what you have to say? And that totally ties into the gratification aspect, really. So I think the gratification aspect and the gatekeeping thing has blended into one thing, if that makes sense.
As for taboo subjects, I can think of plenty. Denouncement of state schools for the deaf and replacing them with another model is one that comes to mind. Anything that criticizes a component of Deaf culture will be very controversial. I’m sure we all could find a hot button to ignite controversy on our blogs. And really, that is what drives the blogs - controversy.
This isn’t your traditional media outlet, obviously. The blogs are an editorialized news medium, so anyone who has critical thinking skills will know that the blogs are biased. I don’t think it’s possible for a blog to be consistently neutral, since a mixture of the blogger’s opinion with the facts is what makes the blog interesting in most cases.
I definitely agree with the idea that what we’re saying reflects a lot on ourselves, but I also think if the blogsite is top-notch, with good bloggers and good commenters, what we’re saying will contribute something to the communities outside of the blogsite. The ideas expressed aren’t necessarily limited to remaining solely on the blogsite. I don’t think our view of the deaf world will be negative, overall. Right now, there are a lot of negative blogs, and I expect to see that to continue for a while, because really like so many others have said in the past, this is the first time that we as a whole, has had the opportunity to truly vent to a mass audience. And to an audience that reacts and understands too. We’re not talking to a brick wall anymore.
Right now the deaf blogosphere is full of white noise, but I anticipate that will decrease as time goes by, and the blogsites will find its niches and we won’t see as many blogs discussing one topic to death. I also foresee them becoming more localized with a couple of national blogsites remaining.
Just my two cents on that. :)
“The blogs are an editorialized news medium, so anyone who has critical thinking skills will know that the blogs are biased. I don’t think it’s possible for a blog to be consistently neutral, since a mixture of the blogger’s opinion with the facts is what makes the blog interesting in most cases.”
Really liked that. Gold.
Sorry but I just saw “300″… and I just thought of one other taboo: pro-eugenics. Or is that moot? Is there one among us who seriously believe we should be wiped out at birth, upon failure of newborn hearing detection? I’d have loved to fight for… Sparta!
In this day and age, what’s truly neutral? The opinion section of the Washington Post is as biased as anything out there… not only in terms of what eventually makes publication, but also in terms of letters to the editor that they won’t let through. As a matter of fact ever since the war with Iraq began it became impossible to get the full story on anything from American newspapers, for two different reasons… one, they usually only print the bad news, and two, they don’t print the really horrible stuff that harms America’s image. So we’re never seeing the good things our troops are doing over there (as McCain says) AND we’re probably not seeing the true extent of the slaughter going on.
I think that the popularity of blogs has grown because a lot of people don’t trust mainstream media as much as they used to, and if everything is biased anyway, why not go to the little guy? If people want a balanced picture, they’ll now get it from two bloggers who disagree with each other on everything. Especially in the Deaf Community, whom mainstream media mostly ignores until a protest flares up.
Mm.. hmm… especially McCain’s “sunday afternoon stroll” in Iraq. Of course, the picture conviently was edited so that the 100 troopers, snipers, and all the heavy artillery wasn’t photographed…
My point being is that nowadays it’s a whole lot of spin, which is why blogs are so refreshing.. Granted, bloggers have their own agenda, but I’d rather have 100 people with 100 different agendas comment on one event than information from one source. You can usually gather what is an approxiation of the truth…
There is a very good controversy going on at Talking Points Memo about the fact that the Washington Post published an editorial yesterday by Liz Cheney bashing Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Syria, identifying her as a formerly high ranking State Department official, and not identifying her as the daughter of VP Dick Cheney. This omission and the fact that Liz Cheney wouldn’t have gotten the State Department positions she had without her father and the half truths offered by Fred Hiatt is a good reason why the WaPo editorial board has become irrelevant to the larger discussions in the worldwide blogs.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c.....t_resp.php
The fact that the mainstream media has become a press release factory for the White House and the Republican party has caused the blogosphere to explode as more and more people find out the news and hard hitting news analysis online rather than relying on an increasingly discredited MSM. The MSM is on the fast track to irrelevancy since they’ve forgotten that they’re supposed to be asking hard questions instead of publishing prepackaged news releases. Judith Miller comes to mind, for one thing, about WMDs.
Oh, and one more thing, the New York Times has a good stable of opinion writers. Unfortunately, nobody’s discussing Paul Krugman or Tom Friedman online because of the NYT’s stupid decision to charge fees for access to editorial pieces. Great way to go to make yourself increasingly irrelevant, NYT.
Chris, I couldn’t be more in agreement. If you don’t mind (too late), am using your words for further commentary.
“In this day and age, what’s truly neutral?… not only in terms of what eventually makes publication, but also in terms of letters to the editor that they won’t let through,” could have been said 50 years ago, and in fact was. That was the gist of the finding of the original gatekeeping study, way back in 1949.
“Ever since the war with Iraq began it became impossible to get the full story on anything from American newspapers.” That’s the basis of gatekeeping, which essentially says we never get the whole story. Not just since the war with Iraq, but since always. Recourse? The “little guy,” as you put it. Blogs enable us to let more information through.
“…for two different reasons… one, they usually only print the bad news, and two, they don’t print the really horrible stuff that harms America’s image.” That bad news is the only news getting play goes to institutional bias inherent in gatekeeping (they have a profit motive and know bad news elicits the most consumer interest). As for underreporting the really horrible news, that’s tricky. The media are the symbolic fourth estate, separate from the three branches of government, but when covering war they’re embedded, and have to be compliant with protocol and national security measures, and the fourth estate is exposed as a myth. The media works in subjugation, and not as a watchdog. There’s also the technical aspect…. reporting is difficult work. Imagine ourselves trying to report on war. I just don’t see how reporters can get it right until years later, when they’re at last able to access declassified records and pry quotes out of soldiers, who likely have become discharged vets by then. So, the media aren’t the only culprit in our failure to get the truth. Also complicit is the government, by and for us.
But McCain says differently, a man can go grocery shopping! What to do? Go to a “little guy” in Iraq, of course. See him tell off the dinosaur… I mean president hopeful. http://raedinthemiddle.blogspo.....-john.html
Just so happens the Washington Post ran this article today. Gives us a glimpse into how interwined the media and military are and how impossible it can be to report on war. Tall order to think any of us can calmly process the chaos around us and convey it on paper by tomorrow morning.
Hi Glen:
You know, it’s not just media that’s being impacted by the little guy. Research will soon have to follow. How much research, for example, makes a big thing of how “hard of hearing” people feel “stuck in the middle” between “the Hearing World” and “Deaf Culture?” Even the most preliminary glance at these blogs/responses will show that’s WAY too simplistic of a worldview. There are all kinds of people in here who don’t consider themselves culturally deaf, but they DO consider themselves biologically deaf, and not hard-of-hearing. Furthermore, I wonder how many would say they feel “stuck between” as opposed to saying “No, I feel comfortable in the middle.”
Blogs are the future. They’re the best qualitative data analysis anyone’s going to find out there.
A data windfall years from now, to be sure. It’s been suggested that the media exacerbate conflicts they report on, often unintentionally (by training, reporters don’t seek nor do editors include quotes along the lines of “Oh, no opinion from me, I’m on the sidelines.” And the principal players are always characterized as polar opposites even though they may in truth be moderates not far removed from the midpoint on either side). So, yeah, there’s this hump of the bell curve that’s not sexy enough for the media. No community is a people of extremists, and with blogs you say we’re beginning to hear from and see the breadth of our middle. Silent majority no more. I like that.
Glenn, it’s been ages since I saw you. Last time I saw you was at Pentagon City Mall, while you were shopping for the holidays with your wife. I waved to say hi, but you ignored me. Then I got angry, seething until I became almost as hot as the cappuccino I was drinking, but then I remembered that you were short-sighted. All is forgiven, my brother!
Brother, my myopia aside, something you said tipped me off that this wasn’t RLM.
So, folks… this guy used this blog, to what gratification?
Part entertainment, part relationship maintenance?
A touch of schadenfreude and a touch of trollish gratification?
I did not write that nefarious comment reminiscent of the most famous forgery in history until Lorenzo Valla proved it in the Middle Ages.
I remember seeing you and your wife. Really funny of you when you denied it three months ago. Frederick Heibard was well known for declaring to world that he was unmarried when he had a wife for 17 years. That occurred in Bavaria (Germany) in 18th century.
I enjoy this blog. You are good at making poignant blogs that make me think twice. Of course, I never rely on bloggers on the view of blogs anyway.
I read internet from time to time.
Why you have to label blogs and assume things about them? Too many people feel they must label things. Most important of all is enjoying to read blogs.
I know you like to read when we were Gallaudet students. We had good talks on VAX. It is really shame of Irving to close VAX. Maybe Davila will bring it back to life. I wrote a letter to him but have not hear back yet.
Robert L. Mason (RLM)
Heh. Here’s a tip for the RLM impersonator - write a bunch of non-sequiturs like he just did above.
It’s the weekend already on the East Coast and I suspect that the sun has set on this blog. : )
Although I had hoped you guys out there would post personally on specific deaf blogs in relation to any of the four theories, this has been fun just the same. TGIF and thanks.
I was appalled of seeing someone writing the blog posting with my own name. I did not write blog postings above regarding Glenn Lockhart and someone else.
Thank you, Deaf Pundit for pointing out the RLM impersonator. I truly appreciate it very much.
I have much respect for Glenn Lockhart as a person. I would never resort to such demeaning language to deflate someone like Glenn Lockhart.
I have to report my so-called RLM blog postings to Shane Feldman and find out the IP address. Thanks again to the Deaf Pundit!
Robert L. Mason (Real RLM!)
I’m surprised there were no mentions of the words “power” or “politics” in this blog.
Nevertheless, what a terrific entry! Loved the inclusion of relevant URLs and background information. Keeps the reader engaged!