Comments on: Letter from Dr. Jane Norman

By: testing_the_truth

testing_the_truth — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:36:56 +0000

As far as I can see, many people expect consequences for those who acted against the interest of Gallaudet University. The Board declared that the best interest of the school was to terminate Jane Fernandes. Therefore those who pushed for her presidency did not necessarily act on the best interest of the school. It is a possible interpretation, at least.

By: college student

college student — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:36:19 +0000

I think JKF will be working from home, while they still look for another presidental candidate….Could this be possible???

By: testing_the_truth

testing_the_truth — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:31:44 +0000

Can I talk?

By: punkybrewster

punkybrewster — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:48:46 +0000

the protest will NEVER remain in the past. this enormous “Whine” will resonate throughout history for the rest of our lives. This will affect our children and their children and so on. “Hey son, remember back in 2006 when 300 deaf students threw a tantrum and overcame authority? use that as an example when the lunch lady gives you apple juice instead of koolaid! go get em tiger!” (btw.. 78% of the people who voted in the Washington Post think the whole farce was wrong. way to go kids… the tax payers that keep your zionist community alive aren’t happy with you.)

By: DeafLinux

DeafLinux — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:47:16 +0000

Jane Norman:

There’s rumors going around stating that you will retire at the end of this year?

I hope not and whatever happens with the protest should remain in the past.

You are a good person and your opinions were valuable.

By: blondel

blondel — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:44:48 +0000

Jane Norman,
You wrote beautifully….with so many good points that Jane Fernandes would be a wonderful president for Gallaudet.

By: Jay

Jay — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:05:00 +0000

I see you very conveniently ignored points 2 and 3 in my response and then declared the conversation finished. Same the protesters are doing. Dismiss any information that doesn’t contribute to your argument and then resume throwing stones.

By: Jay

Jay — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:58:40 +0000

Exactly!!

By: punkybrewster

punkybrewster — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:57:45 +0000

HAHA! I like you. =)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:32:16 +0000

Paranoia rampant isn’t an attractive trait or something that employers look for in prospective employees.

Keep your tinfoilhat firmly wrapped around your balding dome and we’ll all be better off.