On March 13, 1988, I. King Jordan became the first deaf president of Gallaudet University, and one of the few successful student strikes ever in U.S. history came to an end. Deaf President Now! took place nearly twenty years ago, and it really doesn’t seem that long ago to me.
The sad thing is, it was long ago enough that the minute-by-minute events of that week are starting to elude my memory, but I certainly remember enough that it’s fresh in my mind. I remember that I was still fairly new to Gallaudet and Deaf culture, so all the hubbub surrounding Lee’s resignation and the choice of his successor went over my head for the most part. Oh, there were rallies and demonstrations prior to the board’s final decision, but since I had classes during those times, I didn’t go. Looking back, I regret that now. But then, who knew this was going to become part of history? I think often when historical events take place, most people aren’t acutely aware that history is taking place, that it is something that will go down in the books. Obviously important battles, seminal events, and the like are history in the making, and people are quite conscious of it. But there are millions of other things that happen that aren’t on the surface, history. But they end up becoming part of our common knowledge, dissected and analyzed by historians, sociologists, anthropologists, and the like.
My first real sense that something momentous was happening was when I saw tons of people rushing around like crazy, dashing this way and that, and a feeling of electricity in the air (cliche, I know, but that’s what it felt like!). I stopped a friend to ask what was going on. She excitedly replied that the board had chosen Elizabeth Zinser, the hearing candidate, as the next president and that the announcement had galvanized students to take matters into their own hands. By the time I found out about the impromptu march to the Mayflower, it was too late for me to join. Still, I found people who were in the know, and quickly got myself up to speed.
That night, there was the first of what would be many meetings in Hughes Gym; all of us on the old wooden floor, with some people sitting up in the bleachers, watching Greg Hlibok, Jerry Covell, Tim Rarus, and Bridgetta Bourne, the four student leaders, telling us what was going to happen: we would boycott our classes and shut down the university.
I’ve heard Gallaudet is a bit different now, but that school year (1987-88) was the first year that there were more mainstream students in the entering freshman class than there were matriculates from the residential schools. That year and the next few years following it constituted the high-water mark for total enrollment as well; the dorms were close to bursting. The social echelon was still heavily dominated by Deaf kids from the state schools, from Deaf families, from the Deaf world; this was before e-mail was popular, text pagers existed on the scale they do today, few students had personal computers, smoking was still allowed on campus, and more than 80% of the students lived in the dorms. People socialized a lot more in the Abbey (now back to Rathskeller) then, hung out in the dorm lobbies, went to on-campus parties, and generally talked to each other face-to-face.
But there were also sharp divisions. The cafeteria was like a high school: the big “D”, strong Deaf/residential kids tended to cluster together in the middle of the cafeteria, close to the salad bar, out in the open. The rooms on the edge had their own little clusters: a mix of graduate students, signing/culturally-aware mainstreamed kids, and the theatre/intelligentsia crowd in one section; the blacks and Asians in another corner; the oral kids and non-Deaf culturally attuned mainstreamed kids in another section. That year, there was an overflow in the cafeteria because enrollment had been so high, so some graduate students and the NSP kids often sat upstairs. The cafeteria merely reflected the same balkanization we saw in the dorms and around campus. While it wasn’t a “Romeo and Juliet” atmosphere, there were definite lines here and there.
During DPN though, those lines temporarily vanished, if only for a short while. Most of us eagerly jumped on the bandwagon, and the very next morning we made our way down to the front entrance to campus. For the following week, we were woken up by fire alarms constantly, attending meetings in Hughes Gym at odd hours (5 a.m. to 6 a.m. was a common time for meetings, but I also remember late night gatherings as well: 10 p.m., 11 p.m., and sometimes later, depending on events. As a historian in the making even then, I expected real confrontation, a tense atmosphere; something out of the textbooks on the 1960s. But it was almost like a festival of sorts. There were a couple booths selling food, t-shirts, buttons, and the like. The weather was mild and sunny, which for D.C. in March was something. People were chatting, moving about, enjoying themselves even as they were protesting. The presence of TV cameras, reporters, and the like just added to the carnival-like environment, especially as the week wore on. One thing that helped us for sure is the fact that the campus was surrounded by walls and an iron gate, unlike most college campuses. This meant we could easily control the flow of traffic in and out, and didn’t have to occupy campus building by building, as they did at say, Columbia in the late 60s.
That first night and the next night, there were tons of people at the phones, waiting to call home. I finally was able to use the phone, and called my parents. It was rather funny, as my parents, veterans of 60s protests, actually begged me to be careful and not to get arrested.
I remember joining one of the various committees that formed– a tree of committees spreading downwards, with various groups responsible for different things around campus. I helped one group guard the southwest corner of campus, by the transportation building. We took over a schoolbus, with flattened tires, that had been moved so that it blocked one of the gates. We were asked to make armbands so that we would be recognized, and to stay there until we were told otherwise. I think I still have my arm/headbands somewhere in a box…
I went another time with some people from the same group to check out all the gates, and make sure there were enough people manning them. There was a group of MSSDers holding their gate off of the Brentwood Parkway, with Gallaudet students’ trucks and cars in front of the gates, blocking the entrance. My best friend at the time had a pickup, and he was often asked to help out, either by using his car to help block the front gates, or to transport food and drink for the leaders and other “top brass.”
On Wednesday night of that week, several of us decided to camp out on the sloping lawn to the left of the entrance. My friend had a pup tent that would sleep two, so we took sleeping bags out there and camped out. It was a rather cold night (remember, this is early March in D.C.!), and I don’t remember being all that comfortable!
Each day we’d stand at the main gates, spread out along the sidewalk. Far from being hostile, the police were actually trying to be as helpful as possible. One cop even asked us to show her a couple of signs, and what we were saying.
Our second big march was planned and prepared, unlike the first jaunt to the Mayflower. This time, we went from campus to the Capitol. We were joined by people of all ages from around the area, and together we set off. A busload of NTID students came down from Rochester to join us, and some people even flew in from around the country. A lot of people marched together as a contigent with other people from their state, and many were carrying state flags. I walked with the California division, and again, it was a relatively warm, sunny, fairly low humidity day in D.C. We’d gotten lucky all week– the worst it ever got was a partly cloudy sky once or twice. I don’t remember the speeches in toto, but I do remember the energy.
We watched the news here and there when we could– quite a few hung out during cafeteria hours so they could be interviewed live down at the front gates. Others decided to go and eat, but to eat quickly. We didn’t really hang out and socialize as we normally did– just grabbed enough eats for energy, kept our eyes glued to TV reports, then went back to join the rest. Campus buildings were padlocked, hardly anyone was in sight– it was a ghost town of sorts. I don’t know about the other floors, but in my dorm, my dormmates got together that Wednesday evening to watch Greg Hlibok, Elizabeth Zinser, and Marlee Matlin all appear with Ted Koppel. I remember the feeling of elation as we saw Hlibok and Matlin shred Zinser to bits, and Koppel adding his own voice to the mix.
Even though we won one of our demands by week’s end (the resignation of Zinser as the newly appointed president), it was becoming clear the protest could stretch out a long longer than any of us thought. The following week was spring break, and some students took off as they had originally planned. Quite a few others changed their minds, and decided to remain on campus, to prevent the administration and faculty from coming in and re-possessing campus. My friend and I decided we would go to his parents’ house in Philadelphia for a couple days, then return and spend the rest of our break protesting. I was glad, as I had had very little sleep– remember, the fire alarms were going on and off all the time, meetings were being held, marches were going on, and despite no classes that week, there was a lot going on to occupy our time and energy. So I agreed- off to Philly.
I was woken up by my friend on the morning of March 13, 1988– I was exhausted, and was sleeping in a bit– he was excited.
“It’s over! We won! We won!” I woke up immediately, and throwing on a shirt and jeans, went out to the kitchen. My friend’s mother joined in and between her and her son, I learned that Spilman had resigned, Phil Bravin was now the chair of the board, Jordan was the new president, and there would be no reprisals for student participation in the strike. We really had won… Thus I missed being present at the very beginning and the very end of DPN, but I was there for more than 80% of it.
Since any plans I’d originally had were scuttled, and there was no need for us to go back to D.C., we decided to spend a day hanging out at and gambling in Atlantic City, and then head up to NTID, where my friend had childhood friends going to school there. Once we arrived in Rochester and people found out we were from Gallaudet, we became instant celebrities, and asked again and again what it was like, what happened, was this true, did this really happen, etc., etc.
The feeling of a common cause, that we were all deaf together fighting for the same thing, wore off fairly rapidly. Within a month, we were all back to the same old grind, back to our social rankings and groups, back to being normal college students. Any sea change would have to wait a few years. But one immediate thing I think it did accomplish, at least for me, was instill a sense of identity. I think DPN was as much a social movement as it was a political event. I know in later years I’d talk with people who weren’t old enough for college, or who had gone elsewhere, and they would reference DPN as a turning point in their lives.
I wasn’t in D.C. for the 10th or the 15th anniversaries, but it’s possible I’ll go back for the 20th. Regardless of whether I’m present or not, DPN will always be a part of my memories, and always a reminder that if you’re secure in who you are and willing to fight for what you believe, you can win- even if you don’t win everything, you can make a stand, and stake out your ground. That’s a lesson I think a lot of people from the 60s have forgotten, and a lesson I plan to never forget.
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.
No related posts
5 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


great essay. i’ve linked to it on my blog.
Sometimes, I think the legend only grows as time goes on. I was just 6 when DPN occured. Children who were born during that year are now high school graduates (hopefully). It’s history. 18 years later, I’m still unable to judge just exactly how much impact DPN had on the deaf community.
What I do know is this: A deaf president of a deaf university strikes me as a “duh” proposition.
But in retrospect, that is exactly the impact the Gallaudet students of 1988 wanted to have on the deaf community of the future. DPN accomplished its goal.
Thanks for linking it! As for the “impact,” it depends on how you look at it. If your perception depends on direct results, the only visible direct result is the fulfillment of the four conditions set during DPN; ancillary changes include the re-establishment of Deaf identity and awareness on campus at Gallaudet (in this sense, you’re correct, Adam: the feeling that a deaf president will succeed Jordan is definitely a result of DPN!). Deaf people worldwide did not suddenly experience positive changes in all aspects of their lives; new laws and regulations beneficial to the Deaf community didn’t suddenly appear.
But I think in the long run, DPN contributed to a sea change– heightened awareness in the population at large has filtered down to some degree, I think. Perhaps readers have a different opinion/perspective?
I loved this post, Dave! I’m finding the same about my own DPN experience as a CSD Fremont student and being one of the student spokespeople (signspeople? heh). It’s fading from memory.
I just had to respond to the impact of DPN. Adam is right - a Deaf president is a “duh” proposition. However, I question the statement that students in 1988 accomplished their goal. I am seeing so many situations where a Deaf administrator is NOT a “duh” proposition to many Deaf people.
For example, at the school where I work now, a high-ranking administrator in charge of the academic division is going to retire. A group made the demand that the next administrator be a qualified Deaf individual. In the chaos that ensued, I was stunned by what occurred. So many Deaf people accused the group of discrimination, of being too radical, of not thinking about how hearing people would feel, and a lot more. And how DID the hearing people feel? One said to me, “Why is this even an issue? I expect the next one to be Deaf, of course.” Everyone else was in full support and did not have any qualms or issues about the movement and about having a Deaf administrator.
Similar stories abound across the country in the past five years. Yes, FIVE years.
So it is necessary to posit the idea that yes, DPN succeeded in a limited sense, but it has not freed us from dysconscious audism. We are a divided community because the system of oppression has succeeded in dividing us.
[…] David Evans commemorated DPN’s 18th anniversary by recounting his own experience during that inauspicious week of March 1988. It is this writer’s opinion that that blog is required reading for every deaf person. Read it. […]