<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Muhammad Cartoon Controversy</title>
	<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DeafDC Blog &#187; DeafDC.com Quoted In Express and Examiner</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>DeafDC Blog &#187; DeafDC.com Quoted In Express and Examiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 14:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>[...] February: Chris Kaftan takes a dive into the Mohammed cartoon controversy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] February: Chris Kaftan takes a dive into the Mohammed cartoon controversy [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeafDC Blog &#187; DeafDC Blog in Today&#8217;s Express</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>DeafDC Blog &#187; DeafDC Blog in Today&#8217;s Express</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-782</guid>
		<description>[...] This morning’s excerpt was from Adam Stone&#8217;s post about last Friday&#8217;s Gallaudet&#8217;s pep rally. Today’s recognition is our third. Our first was last February when Express quoted Chris Kaftan&#8217;s post analyzing the Mohammed cartoon controversy, and the second was last March&#8217;s excerpt from Adam’s blog post about the D.C. government soliciting bids for free Wi-Fi coverage across the District. This also represents the first DeafDC.com quote about a deaf-related topic. Evidently, hearing people (or Express editors) are just as interested in our little community as we are. Again - thank you for being a part of DeafDC.com; it&#8217;s your support that makes our increased visibility and relevance possible. So - thanks! P.S. Didn’t get to pick up today’s Express for some bizarre reason? Download it here. Look at page 31. Caution, though - it’s a really, really big PDF. I mean, big. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This morning’s excerpt was from Adam Stone&#8217;s post about last Friday&#8217;s Gallaudet&#8217;s pep rally. Today’s recognition is our third. Our first was last February when Express quoted Chris Kaftan&#8217;s post analyzing the Mohammed cartoon controversy, and the second was last March&#8217;s excerpt from Adam’s blog post about the D.C. government soliciting bids for free Wi-Fi coverage across the District. This also represents the first DeafDC.com quote about a deaf-related topic. Evidently, hearing people (or Express editors) are just as interested in our little community as we are. Again - thank you for being a part of DeafDC.com; it&#8217;s your support that makes our increased visibility and relevance possible. So - thanks! P.S. Didn’t get to pick up today’s Express for some bizarre reason? Download it here. Look at page 31. Caution, though - it’s a really, really big PDF. I mean, big. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Narthiel</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Narthiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Search the Q'uran. Study the Hadith. Consider the doctrine of abbrogation within Islam, and you'll discover rather quickly that the view of Islam as a religion of peace is nothing more than a myth concocted by those who would be willfully ignorant. Understand, however, that just because the religion itself commands outrageous crimes against humanity, Jihad, and an exclusivist outlook which inevitably results in terrorist attacks the likes of which we saw on September 11th, 2001, that does NOT mean that all Muslims are like that. Many Muslims are pleasant, peaceable people with good intentions and a more or less helpful, optimistic outlook on life. These are the Muslims who fail to fully understand what their religion actually teaches (and it's not a phenomena exclusive to Islam. In almost every major religion, you'll find numerous sects and branches which fail to truly understand what their respective religion really teaches.)

That being said, I think the Muslim community as a whole forfeited their right to an apology when they started burning down buildings and killing innocents because of a political cartoon. The very idea itself is sick and absurd beyond belief. The Prophet Muhammed is the not the first religious icon to be demonized in a political cartoon. How often do you hear of Buddhists burning down embassies because of a disrespectful article, book, or cartoon directed at their religion? Or hindus? Or wiccans? Or, dare I say it, Christians? Of all the major religious icons through history, Jesus has probably been mocked, demonized, and offensively portrayed more than any other. But when was the last time you heard of Christians worldwide rising up  to burn down buildings, kill innocents, riot in the streets, and generally wreak all havoc and chaos because of a political cartoon?

(And if you're going to try and use the Crusades as an example, don't. What the Roman Catholic church did in the past cannot be used as an indicator of Christian behavior. Anyone who calls the Roman Catholic church of the Dark Ages a true Christian organization is simply misinformed...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search the Q&#8217;uran. Study the Hadith. Consider the doctrine of abbrogation within Islam, and you&#8217;ll discover rather quickly that the view of Islam as a religion of peace is nothing more than a myth concocted by those who would be willfully ignorant. Understand, however, that just because the religion itself commands outrageous crimes against humanity, Jihad, and an exclusivist outlook which inevitably results in terrorist attacks the likes of which we saw on September 11th, 2001, that does NOT mean that all Muslims are like that. Many Muslims are pleasant, peaceable people with good intentions and a more or less helpful, optimistic outlook on life. These are the Muslims who fail to fully understand what their religion actually teaches (and it&#8217;s not a phenomena exclusive to Islam. In almost every major religion, you&#8217;ll find numerous sects and branches which fail to truly understand what their respective religion really teaches.)</p>
<p>That being said, I think the Muslim community as a whole forfeited their right to an apology when they started burning down buildings and killing innocents because of a political cartoon. The very idea itself is sick and absurd beyond belief. The Prophet Muhammed is the not the first religious icon to be demonized in a political cartoon. How often do you hear of Buddhists burning down embassies because of a disrespectful article, book, or cartoon directed at their religion? Or hindus? Or wiccans? Or, dare I say it, Christians? Of all the major religious icons through history, Jesus has probably been mocked, demonized, and offensively portrayed more than any other. But when was the last time you heard of Christians worldwide rising up  to burn down buildings, kill innocents, riot in the streets, and generally wreak all havoc and chaos because of a political cartoon?</p>
<p>(And if you&#8217;re going to try and use the Crusades as an example, don&#8217;t. What the Roman Catholic church did in the past cannot be used as an indicator of Christian behavior. Anyone who calls the Roman Catholic church of the Dark Ages a true Christian organization is simply misinformed&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeafDC Blog &#187; DeafDC.com Blog in Express!</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>DeafDC Blog &#187; DeafDC.com Blog in Express!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>[...] This morning&#8217;s excerpt was from Adam&#8217;s blog about the D.C. government soliciting bids for free Wi-Fi coverage across the District. Today&#8217;s recognition comes five weeks after Chris Kaftan was similarly quoted from his blog analyzing the Mohammed cartoon controversy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This morning&#8217;s excerpt was from Adam&#8217;s blog about the D.C. government soliciting bids for free Wi-Fi coverage across the District. Today&#8217;s recognition comes five weeks after Chris Kaftan was similarly quoted from his blog analyzing the Mohammed cartoon controversy. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahms</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>In response to bobby 
 Earlier you said that Islam  is not a peaceful religoin.My question to you is that do you have any proof of that.How can you say that the attacks of sept 11 were done by the islamic community.watch and witness that whose country is engaged in taking lifes of millions of innocent people by labeling them as terrorist and attacking their country by saing that this  it is the War against terrorism.Isnt it Inhuman,take the example of Afganistan,iraq and im sure that there are many more countrys to follw up such as syria,pakistan and Saudia Arabia. One should just go and witness the way these people are getting treated  in iraq.and whose the whole and sole responsible for all the oil refinerys.
I know that this article is harsh but one should just look at it as a general point of view and should think at the every steps that are taking place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to bobby<br />
 Earlier you said that Islam  is not a peaceful religoin.My question to you is that do you have any proof of that.How can you say that the attacks of sept 11 were done by the islamic community.watch and witness that whose country is engaged in taking lifes of millions of innocent people by labeling them as terrorist and attacking their country by saing that this  it is the War against terrorism.Isnt it Inhuman,take the example of Afganistan,iraq and im sure that there are many more countrys to follw up such as syria,pakistan and Saudia Arabia. One should just go and witness the way these people are getting treated  in iraq.and whose the whole and sole responsible for all the oil refinerys.<br />
I know that this article is harsh but one should just look at it as a general point of view and should think at the every steps that are taking place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>In response to Bobby...

I suppose I can agree on the fact that this is a "branch" of Islam, not the whole religion.  What I am saying is this.  The people in the Middle East are offended because a newspaper portrays their most holy prophet in light of violence.  The subsequent undertone is that the followers are also violent.  This "offends" them, so to protest what do they do?  They become violent!  Say what you will...but when numerous countries have experienced embassies being burned and innocent people being killed over cartoons...I would call that militant.  The people in the street are not just Al Qaeda and Hamas, they are everyday people.  I do not think we should try to "understand" their repeated actions of violence.  I do not recall trying to understand the Nazis.  We just went in and took care of business.  That's an offensive term we call the "American Way."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Bobby&#8230;</p>
<p>I suppose I can agree on the fact that this is a &#8220;branch&#8221; of Islam, not the whole religion.  What I am saying is this.  The people in the Middle East are offended because a newspaper portrays their most holy prophet in light of violence.  The subsequent undertone is that the followers are also violent.  This &#8220;offends&#8221; them, so to protest what do they do?  They become violent!  Say what you will&#8230;but when numerous countries have experienced embassies being burned and innocent people being killed over cartoons&#8230;I would call that militant.  The people in the street are not just Al Qaeda and Hamas, they are everyday people.  I do not think we should try to &#8220;understand&#8221; their repeated actions of violence.  I do not recall trying to understand the Nazis.  We just went in and took care of business.  That&#8217;s an offensive term we call the &#8220;American Way.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>"Islam is not a peaceful religion."  I think it's important, especially at this time, to make a distinction between "ISLAM" and the people themselves. While religion-as-Islam may have violent undertones (you can equally argue the Bible does) it ultimately comes down to the people and what they decide to do.  The _real_ issue is MILTIANT Islams, not the Islam religion itself.  The religion does not say "Go kill America."  A militant Islam _person_ says "Go kill America."  

September 11 was the first time we had an encounter with "Muslim" terrorists on our home land... all the previous terrorists who struck America were quite American (Unabomber for example).  Saying the problems of the world today are the result of radical Islam is ignoring our own very large role in shaping the world as it is today.  For instance, we were very "buddy-buddy" with Saddam a few decades ago, providing him with weapons and support.  Look where that got us today.

The real point is that we absolutely must not blindly point at the Islam-Muslim religion-people and scream "YOU!" without really understanding what's happening.  We should not condone their violence, but at the same time, the violence will just get worse if we don't at least make an personal attempt to understand. We've killed anywhere from 16,000 to 48,000 people in Iraq.  Think about that... how many people have Iraqi terrorists killed on American land?  0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Islam is not a peaceful religion.&#8221;  I think it&#8217;s important, especially at this time, to make a distinction between &#8220;ISLAM&#8221; and the people themselves. While religion-as-Islam may have violent undertones (you can equally argue the Bible does) it ultimately comes down to the people and what they decide to do.  The _real_ issue is MILTIANT Islams, not the Islam religion itself.  The religion does not say &#8220;Go kill America.&#8221;  A militant Islam _person_ says &#8220;Go kill America.&#8221;  </p>
<p>September 11 was the first time we had an encounter with &#8220;Muslim&#8221; terrorists on our home land&#8230; all the previous terrorists who struck America were quite American (Unabomber for example).  Saying the problems of the world today are the result of radical Islam is ignoring our own very large role in shaping the world as it is today.  For instance, we were very &#8220;buddy-buddy&#8221; with Saddam a few decades ago, providing him with weapons and support.  Look where that got us today.</p>
<p>The real point is that we absolutely must not blindly point at the Islam-Muslim religion-people and scream &#8220;YOU!&#8221; without really understanding what&#8217;s happening.  We should not condone their violence, but at the same time, the violence will just get worse if we don&#8217;t at least make an personal attempt to understand. We&#8217;ve killed anywhere from 16,000 to 48,000 people in Iraq.  Think about that&#8230; how many people have Iraqi terrorists killed on American land?  0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I think we all know what the problem here is...Muslim radicals are eagerly looking for a reason to explode (no pun intended) toward the Western mindset, i.e. democracy, free speech, freedom of religion, etc.  They are brainwashed fanatics who want the world to revere Muhammad they way they do.  And if the world doesn't?  Well, they will just act like savages to prove their point.  Call me arrogant, call me American, call me whatever...most of the problems in the world today are the result of radical Islam.  Are all Muslims terrorists?  Of course not.  Are most terrorists Muslims? Yes.  Let's quit being so freakin' PC and call things what they are!  Would I be upset if Jesus Christ were depicted in a blasphemous light?  Yes!  Absolutely!  But I would not burn down buildings and kill people.  Say what you will...Islam is not a peaceful religion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we all know what the problem here is&#8230;Muslim radicals are eagerly looking for a reason to explode (no pun intended) toward the Western mindset, i.e. democracy, free speech, freedom of religion, etc.  They are brainwashed fanatics who want the world to revere Muhammad they way they do.  And if the world doesn&#8217;t?  Well, they will just act like savages to prove their point.  Call me arrogant, call me American, call me whatever&#8230;most of the problems in the world today are the result of radical Islam.  Are all Muslims terrorists?  Of course not.  Are most terrorists Muslims? Yes.  Let&#8217;s quit being so freakin&#8217; PC and call things what they are!  Would I be upset if Jesus Christ were depicted in a blasphemous light?  Yes!  Absolutely!  But I would not burn down buildings and kill people.  Say what you will&#8230;Islam is not a peaceful religion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Has anybody watched southpark? They take the piss out of most religions and it is sooo much worse than those stupid cartoon drawings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody watched southpark? They take the piss out of most religions and it is sooo much worse than those stupid cartoon drawings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie t.</title>
		<link>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>julie t.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deafdc.com/blog/chris-kaftan/2006-02-05/the-muhammad-cartoon-controversy/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I don't understand. You closed your paragraph with this line: "While I am all for freedom of speech, it was offensive and blasphemous to depicit Muhammad as a terrorist.  Shouldn’t these European newspapers print an apology for how Muhammad was depicted? Muhammad should not be depicted as a terrorist."

And yet, on a very public forum, you reproduced these same cartoons (even though they claimedly go against your beliefs).  

Please clarify this apparent discrepancy in your thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand. You closed your paragraph with this line: &#8220;While I am all for freedom of speech, it was offensive and blasphemous to depicit Muhammad as a terrorist.  Shouldn’t these European newspapers print an apology for how Muhammad was depicted? Muhammad should not be depicted as a terrorist.&#8221;</p>
<p>And yet, on a very public forum, you reproduced these same cartoons (even though they claimedly go against your beliefs).  </p>
<p>Please clarify this apparent discrepancy in your thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
