Yesterday the Gallaudet Board of Trustees announced that Jane Fernandes would step down as provost in order to focus on her new role as president-select. Clever move.
The Board was under immense pressure to make a move - any move - as it seemed Fernandes supporters and protesters were at a stalemate. The NAD, the NBDA, and the GUAA issued statements pleading with them to act. Even two past chairs of the board, Phil Bravin and Glenn Anderson, both widely respected, wrote a letter, repeating by now the oft-abused motif - “Do something!”
So, do something, they did. But with not quite the result the community was looking for.
Rather than unite the fractured community or restore faith, the BoT pushed even more support behind their divisive choice of president.
Granted, the fact that Jane Fernandes now has even more time on her hands to address issues can be interpreted as a step toward progress. But it also highlights the fact that the BoT is determined not to back down from their choice, a move that points in a direction away from the FSSA’s request to re-open the presidential search.
That direction, we believe, is also one in which the majority of the community would not like to go.
It is also a move that potentially could put the FSSA in a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation. Embrace the president-select’s pending efforts to address issues, and the FSSA looks like it’s softening its resolve. Refuse to work with the president-select, and the FSSA looks like an uncollaborative bunch of whiners.
But it’s also a move that puts the FSSA in an incredible position of power. Not only did they announce that two searches would begin, one for interim provost, and one for a permanent provost, by making a move that strengthens their commitment to Dr. Fernandes as president, they further demonstrated their refusal to consider the community’s wishes.
It is, after all, still the community’s University.
Sure, we want a University that brings academic prestige and opportunity to deaf and hard of hearing people everywhere. That’s always been our first and foremost reason for being proud Gallaudetians.
But we also want a University that unites us. We also want a University where staffmembers aren’t afraid to be themselves, to contribute in ways of their own choices. We want a University where members are empowered and oppression is a common denominator in our past. We also want a University where the president will look at the university’s members and give them recognition where it’s due. We also want a University where students, alumni, and faculty will hold their own president up high as a respected leader and role model for our youth.
Gallaudet with Jane K. Fernandes as its president, especially with the way she got that position, is not that University.
We certainly are not inspired by a president-select who has failed to show one iota of leadership quality since her selection was announced.
So, with the BoT’s statement that Dr. Fernandes is throwing all her effort into the presidency, the FSSA has even stronger grounds now to say that, once again, the community has been ignored. Their case has now, in fact, been bolstered by the BoT’s actions.
Should the FSSA and its supporters work diplomatically toward helping to identify a suitable provost to lead our scholars forth? Absolutely. But that doesn’t mean the two demands should be abandoned or that our resolve should be softened.
FSSA, the Kaftans are behind you. Unity for Gallaudet.
The next move is yours.
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.

I have been thinking long and hard about this… about why the BoT is still intransigent in keeping Jane as the President. I have come to the conclusion that the BoT recognizes that Gallaudet is a federally funded institution aimed at educating the deaf. The deaf population in the United States is approximately 28-34 million. How many of them are ASL users and so-called members of the Deaf community? Approximately 600,000.
Since Congress/federal government funds it, I am very confident that they want Gallaudet to maximize its impact on ALL deaf students, not just those who happen to use ASL.
To me, Jane clearly understands the future of deaf education and where it is going. The BoT knows that too.
Maybe that’s something to think about?
Actually, the figure is most likely closer to 900,000.
See here http://www.deafdc.com/blog/?p=337 Post #3212
Dr. Stika of San Diego State University says the reasonable ball park for ASL users to be between 1.9 and 2.1 percent of the whole deaf/hard of hearing population. So 600,000 is more realistic.
Who are you? Gally Student or Stabber?
A community realist!
And I remember the figures well because she spoke of this at a presentation of the local HLAA (SHHH) meeting 3 yrs ago. I was there and I read it on the CART screen.
Why would nonsigners want to go to Gallaudet if they don’t know ASL and are not willing to learn? Hearing impaired nonsigners of college age can continue on to colleges that provide an environment similar to their high school.
If Gallaudet is going to continue to just give lip service (get it?) to the idea of fluent ASL (and not spoken English, not SEE, not simultaneous communication) as the official language on campus, perhaps we need a new university. And AG Bell oral fetishists are welcome to take over the university. Is this your view of the future of deaf education?
Why does deaf education as you call it has to be in ASL only?
The ideal approach would be true bi-bi, which includes ASL, Spoken and Written English.
Being deaf does not mean you should not be able to speak.
There is more to deaf education than what you see in the insular world of the Deaf community, thank you very much.
Why must Gallaudet be held hostage by supporters who appear to prefer being taught in ASL only?
Written English? Fine. ASL? Of course. Spoken English? I can’t bleeping hear or speak English! Are you recommending that I take classes to improve my hearing and speaking ability to understand spoken English?
Gallaudet has been held hostage by ASL opponents for a long time.
One more comment:
Deaf education is not just about ONLY you. It is about the 28-34 million deaf persons in the United States.
Nah. You and 27-33 million people can have your special Deaf education.
We ASL users want education. Period.
You are perfectly welcome to your pure ASL education, but please don’t ask American taxpayers to pay for a non-inclusive education. Moreover, you may find that the education you get will limit you in the outside world.
A non-ASL based curriculum for deaf children is exclusive.
A truly ASL centered, bilingual curriculum is more inclusive than any other curriculum. This works. Tax money should go to what works, not what is f’ed up! Nonsigners and ASL opponents are f’ing things up.
And you clearly don’t live up to your name when you use the term “pure ASL education.”
And a lot of Gallaudet students have not been getting the education they need in the outside world. Time for a real change, not just at Gallaudet.
If you wish to be successful in my industry, you MUST be capable of communicating in a perfectly clear English, with the capability of understanding the deep subtlity of the language itself to phrase your concepts correctly.
This is the challenge that Gallaudet University must confront for the vast majority of career paths out there open to all people, not exclusively to deaf students.
Total Communication = Tender Loving Care.
Correct, A Voice. To exclude any form of communication access is to exclude the possibility of a path to success.
There’s a saying, it’s not about what’s best for everybody but what is best for the person.
voice-mccon, if you’re talking about perfectly clear *spoken* English, then you are simple-minded, prejudiced, anti-ASL, oral fetishits (misspelling intended).
LOL someone from gally saying they want an education not a federally funded country club to party at… thats the best joke I have heard all weekend.
second of all everyone has their own method of learning and communicating… not all hearing people are effective speakers some are effective writiers and to focus on just one moeth of comunication is being closed minded… I thought the deaf communitied prided itself in being open minded… seems like some of you dont even know where you stand yourselves.
Written English is very much a possibility, but it is extremely important in my field to have the ability to speak English clearly (if not perfectly — I’m far from perfect, but it’s passable.)
Yes, we have the ADA, and a variety of other laws that is supposed to protect us, but…
There are always someone out there better/cheaper/more experienced than you. Any of your own liability place you at a risk for not getting a contract job in this industry.
There are exceptions, but that’s due to the incredible reputation that have been built. There is one particular RIT friend that I know of that does not speak English at all, but hold a mastery of Legal English. Even with his incredible mind, he still had to fight hard to get into those tightly closed doors, and gain so much of a positive reputation that he’s sought after by large (and famous) businesses out there. Even Google put in a feeler for him, despite his lack of a college degree.
But that’s after a decade and half of incredibly hard work. Compared to him, a normal hearing person would not have to work as hard to convince others of their worth.
This is what we have to deal with. Why limit yourself to just ASL when it’s entirely possible to master the spoken word, and the visual word at the same time?
After all, there are many out there that can speak in a half dozen languages, and is highly sought after in many different fields. Learn ASL. Learn English. Aprenda el español. 日本語を学びなさい.
Don’t limit yourself. Don’t encourage your peers to limit themselves. Grow. Learn. Thrive. Prove to the world that we can do ANYTHING but hear. After all, that’s the DPN’s motto, no?
It’s a sad fact that we do have to work twice as hard than hearing people at many jobs. I’m not an attorney here, but what you (a voice) are describing, I believe, violates EEO laws.
If enough Deaf people file complaints, eventually we wouldn’t have to fight so hard to get promoted. Very painful in short term, but it’s good for the long term.
And yes, before anyone asks me, I’ve filed complaints, and I’ve suffered through retaliation as a result, but it’s worth fighting for.
Yes, it DOES violate the EEO laws.
But here’s the dirty little secret — if you file a lawsuit, you will find it MUCH harder to get a job in the same area. Sure, you can keep on suing, but it’s both expensive, and you would not be able to find a job that you will enjoy and love to work in, with friendly co-workers.
It’s like breaking the picket line during the union’s strikes — break it, and you will not get a job in the industry again.
I echo f’ed up ed. I can speak, but not hear English. What’s the point? Would much rather focus on getting what I can do, perfectly, than waste time learning in a medium I can’t access.
well shouldnt any deaf person that goes to gally be able to get an education? what about people that cannot access the ASL medium? what happens to those deafies cuz they grew up in the middle of now where with no support system? or ASL instruction and had to learn another meduim to surive?
shouldnt gally meet all the different deafies types of mediums? (to a point)NTID does a lot to support a lot of different communication methods.
I wonder now… since it seems the ASL crowd is getting smaller and smaller with in the deaf community is this battle about something else and not really JFK? are these people fighting for their dying community… you see all the deaf girls getting CI cuz they dont want to date deaf guys and they want an educated hearing guy who makes good money not some deaf bum slacker on SSI. second of all why does it seem like there are a lot more educated deaf girls then deaf guys? why do I see all these deaf girls with professional jobs and making good money while there arent a whole lot of us deaf guys that arent? seems like guys at RIT or Gally arent serious about getting an education… maybe this is something the deaf community should look at.
Observer, if they cannot access the ASL medium, then they should not be attending college at all. Period. I’m not talking about blind/deaf persons.. If they cannot understand ASL, then it’s clear that they cannot understand ANY language, therefore, unfit for college.
so these deaf people should be shut out is that what your say denied an opportunity? basically it would fair for a hearing college based on your statement to say oh deaf people are unfit for our college so they cannot come cuz they use ASL and english is the medium we use here.
I believe that ASL users are now the minority in the deaf community and if gally wants to stay alive they are going to have to adjust. if they want to stay open and get people who will come there get a good degree and show the working world gally is not a federally funded country club
Deaf Pundit: Are you saying that a person like Jane Fernandez should not be allowed to be in college, because she didn’t learn ASL as you advocate?
There are many other deaf people I know of personally, and will not name on here, that started their college careers with absolutely no sign language knowledge. They grew into the Deaf community, and became one of their biggest advocates by the time they graduates.
Are they all not worthy of such a college education simply because they was not raised with sign?
Uhhhh… JK DID learn ASL. She may not sign it perfectly, but she does know and use ASL now.
ASL users have *always* been the minority. So what?
For clarification, I was referring to Observer’s statement: “what about people that cannot access the ASL medium?”
D/deaf people can access it, if they make an effort to learn it. If they are incapable of learning it, then they are unfit for college. That is what I meant.
I understand. Sorry for the confusion.
This protest IS not about whether J. Fernandes is deaf enough or about her views on deaf politics. It has to do with how she performed as a Provost for the past six years….She hasnt proved to the gallaudet community that she can lead us into the 21st century…..
but now the whole thing is much more than fernandes inability to lead
We are already in the 21st century.
According to other blogs, it is very apparent that your belief is incorrect, GallyAlum — the true position that is hidden for political reason is just that.
Please do not continue to obfuscate the situation.
the gally kids had their chance… what is it you dont understand about that? they were too busy partying to pay attention to what was going on campus? do they want a second chance like they always get? sorry this is the real world they lose… so basically tent city is just a party place for them all… if gally was smart enough they would take away the water, food coming in and restrooms these kids have access to then these kids would have to leave.
I think we need to make a decision between the future the government wants for deaf people and the education we want for ourselves. If you guys are happy with Gallaudet turning into some kind of counterop VESID or job-training center….
I hope these gally kids piss off people on capital hill and get gally shut down. that would be the best thing that could happen right about now. lol what do they have to protest about then? nothing cuz they failed gally and the point of the school by failing to get an education while being there.
Gally won’t shut down. There’s far too many alumni out there who won’t allow that to happen.
And while I’m disgusted at how the protesters handled themselves, there are reports filtering out now, AFTER the protests, about JK’s conduct at Kendall. Like what you ask? Such as when a teacher went on maternity leave, JK hired a long-term sub teacher who didn’t know sign. Parents complained, JK ignored them, so some of the parents ended up pulling their kids out.
The BoT was STUPID not to take in account of past behavior. So, the protests may be over, but I think the battle is far from over. If FSSA really wants to get JK out, they need to get out there and talk to EVERYONE, including former Kendall parents and document all of those kind of incidents.
The protest isn’t over. Just because everyone’s gone home for the summer doesn’t mean the protest’s over. As for getting the former Kendall parents, MSSD staff, etc. involved, why do you think the FSSA meetings are closed to the public? Those people do not want to be seen or known because they are scared of the administration.
You need to explain how Fernandes “failed to show one iota of leadership quality since her selection was announced.”
Remember, she was the subject of harrassment, belittlement and scorn for the past 10 days in what I would typify as no real dialogue on the protesters part but only used the opportunity to heap scorn.
Again I ask this question, unity for whom?
All ASL users. Are you an ASL user?
So now it is an issue of ASL versus the rest of the world?
I remarked to someone that I believe that this protest is more than just Fernandes, but the future of deaf education as it is.
Anyways, I better shut up for a day or so lest I become another McConnell.
Seems we agree! Sort of. This whole thing is now more than fernandes’ ability to lead. Deaf Education has got to go. No more nonsigners in positions of power where deaf children are concerned.
Milan 1880. Never forget. ASL opponents are far far more powerful than ASL proponents. We ASL proponents are losing, and badly. Last gasp?
you guys are barking up a tree that doesnt exist yet….. deaf people are famous for assuming **** before it happens… dont be the “ass” in “ass”uming.
where and when did JFK said she is going to take away ASL from gally?
Yeah. The protests have been plagued by problems, such as not giving any substantive facts about JKF’s poor performance as provost. What exactly did she do as a provost that alienated so many people? The answer, “She was a bitch” isn’t good enough. And why don’t people trust her?
Nobody’s been able to really answer that. Nobody’s given any specific examples, except for the library one, and that one was explained away.
Until those questions are answered, the protests will really not go anywhere. Which is why I think the FSSA should focus on influencing who gets the intermin and permanent provost positions.
may if these uneducated people got an education they could make a point. they just want to protest cause they can… it doent matter who got picked they would be out there protesting… they are all about image… deaf people are image focused people look at me I am cool cuz I am protesting but I have no idea why I am protesting.
these people just want to either relive the DPN days or try to become history like the DPN people.
Okay - surely other readers can add to our list, but how about
1) lack of public appearances to deal specifically with protest issues? The only appearances she’s made is one on May 2nd with Dr. Jordan, during which she basically said she wasn’t stepping down but she would try to be more social. The others are the daily fora in which she answered questions with platitudes and vague, abstract answers and eventually cut short because she didn’t like criticism or being asked the same questions because she wasn’t providing satisfactory answers. If her response to criticism is to shut down and leave, then that in itself says more about the kind of dialogue she’s willing to have as president/provost.
2) BoT members repeatedly visited Tent City and conversed with protesters. Dr. Fernandes never once visited. The only time (that we know of) she was seen in public was to try to get protesters to open up the 6th street garage on the day of the FSSA-imposed lockdown. Otherwise, she has never come out of hiding to talk with people (other than media) about protest issues.
3) In fact, she refused to meet with the FSSA board.
4) Since her selection, she has not addressed the campus-wide community at all related to tension about her own selection. Such a message might indicate hope for the future and for unity, but no, there’s been nothing. The only non-graduation message that she’s sent out was the day of the bomb scare, in which she said the BoT meeting would be closed due to “extenuating circumstances” and they’d e-mail results next week. No explanation, no reassurance, nothing. Even a message assuring the campus that they still had the freedom of speech or encouraging dialogue toward constructive ends would have been nice. But no, people on campus are still scared to say anything (for or against or neutrally), especially those without job security. There’s just been no proactivity on her part.
Regardless of viewpoint, people on campus are looking to Dr. Fernandes to either resign or DO SOMETHING to repair the tear in the community. Obviously, she’s not willing to do the former. But as president-select, she certainly could and should do the latter.
Here’s a question for you, out of sheer curiosity — what would you consider “real dialogue” on both Dr. Fernandes and protesters’ parts?
Hmmm interesting. I thought JK held a forum every afternoon there? I could be wrong…
As for a realistic dialogue, I want the FSSA to come up with concrete facts to support their position, so that they have a leg to stand on when they discuss this with not only JK but also the BoT members. I want JK to sit down and be honest, instead of evasive and ducking out. I want her to come up with facts on her side that would either support or detract from her position. I want the BoT to explain why they picked her over others, how the last 3 were picked, and how much King Jordan influenced them. And finally, once you get all that out of the way, I want all faculty members to get together to discuss all of the reasons why they voted a no-confidence against JK, and the problems that they’ve had to deal with over the years. It’s not really that big of a task, just common sense. But in D.C. land, nothing is ever what it seems.
hey mcconnell, I’m happy you’re showing some brain activity since the announcement of the provost search.
I think the reason why the BoT is holding strong on its choice is because they have not heard one shred of evidence that the search process was flawed. In the face of the bitter hostility and antagonism that greeted JKF upon the announcement of her appointment, I have to applaud her calm presence and commitment to do the best for Gallaudet and ALL students who might apply in the future. If that isn’t leadership, I don’t know what is.
I do agree with some issues FSSA raised, such as the fact that there are faculty who cannot sign well enough, or at all, to communicate content info to students.
I really think FSSA and the Gallaudet community should give her a chance to prove herself. Let’s see that the confidence the BoT placed in her was warranted.
FSSA can take the moral high ground by participating in the temp and permanent Provost searches.
Nice feeling how nonsigner Brueggmann’s giving it to us signers up the wazoo, huh?
Keep in mind the Deaf world is diverse. It is not an exclusive club of ASL-only. Brueggemann is oral deaf and chose to use voice during her presentation. It is her right to communicate how she choose. Just as it is your right to use ASL. It is not right to force it down anyone’s throat, or wazoo. Just because BB chose to voice instead of sign does not imply everybody else has to. Gallaudet For All!
The Deaf World is diverse, no question. But there is no Deaf World without ASL. Gallaudet must be for ASL users.
forcing anybody to sign isn’t right — like forcing deaf asl users to use speech rather than sign was (and is!) still not right.
But I hate, really hate, the fact that I can’t communicate with Brueggemann when she is the bleeping chair of Gallaudet BOT!
Good point, I agree — there would be no Deaf world without ASL. I also got to agree I was turned off seeing BB talk her speech instead of sign. It is her right, and I respect it, but I sure did feel excluded. Didn’t feel good, either. But that’s by the by. I do agree that college instruction at Gallaudet must be in ASL, and that all professors MUST be fluent in ASL, after you give them a couple years to become fluent. This is an issue I’d love to see the Gally community pursue with Fernandes. However, Gallaudet can ALSO make its instruction accessible to other deaf who are oral or were taught SEE and Cued Speech as a result of being mainstreamed. Keep in mind their educational background may not have been their personal choice. But now that they are adults, they come to Gally to develop their Deaf identity and join the Deaf world. Hopefully, they will feel inspired to master ASL by seeing positive deaf role models, and we who are ASL communicators can make them feel welcome by being patient and going the extra mile to make them feel one of us.
agree with much of what you said.
Why aren’t deaf cued speech users fluent in ASL? And how can professors at Gallaudet teach them if they don’t know ASL? Cued speech interpreters at Gallaudet?
How fast can strict SEE users become fluent in ASL? (By the way, I have never seen a deaf person who signs strict SEE!)
By all means Gallaudet should welcome all signers and aspiring signers. All communication through hands. Stop disfiguring ASL by simultaneous communication.
Gallaudet is for ASL users. SEE users. Cued Speech users. Oral users. Voice preference users. Cochlear Implant users. There is no “I” here but a “we”. And I ask again, unity for whom?
I feel somewhat qualified to answer these comments, being a native Deaf cuer. My exposure to ASL began only shortly before I arrived at Gallaudet as a freshman. I am now comfortable with ASL, and I still cue today. Although in social terms, Gallaudetians can be clique-ey when it comes to communication preferences, I’ve never seen any indication that Gallaudet as a whole is unwelcoming to non-signers (the New Signers Program has proven a boon to many), SEE-users, HOH, oral students, cuers, and so forth. People from all these populations have come to Gallaudet and found themselves enriched by both the rich culture and ASL exposure as well as the respect for communication diversity. I am one of them.
And I answer again, unity for ASL users. If cochlear implant users use ASL, welcome! If hearing people use ASL, welcome! If cued speech users use ASL, welcome!
ASL opponents are not welcome. AG Bell oralists who insist that everybody speak English are not welcome. 24/7 simultaneous communicators are not welcome.
People who do not sign when we are present exclude us deaf signers. People do not have to be fluent in ASL, but if they sign, they must sign in a way that respects it. Sounds simple, but why is this so hard to understand and to do?
Thanks for sharing Allison. I appreciate the useful information you gave us. I wonder if you would agree that ASL is what unifies you and other people of diverse backgrounds at Gallaudet?
Actually, al should be welcomed regardless of the used. If the person is not comfortable signing and would prefer to speak, then let the person speak. Gallaudet University is an inclusionary institution that invites all in the assurance that each deaf/hh student is comfortable with his/her mode of communication. Forcing the student to learn sign language is not the answer. Establishing a comfortable environment is key.
And yet, when one prefer to speak to another student (say hh to hh) and not use signs, they’re labeled with the “hearing sign to the forehead”. I did that all the time at Gallaudet whenever I talked to a hearing person when there is absolutely no need to sign to talking to some of my friends who happen to be hard of hearing. Even they get labeled with the hearing sign to the forehead comment from Deaf students. Several have indicated to me that they experienced that kind of discriminatory practices by mostly Deaf students. It was a practice that was widely accepted by the campus population for years, even now. But of course, it all “stopped” with this “unity” thing. Right?
Sure, let that nonsigner in my class. Sure, let the professor and nonsigner interact in spoken English during classtime. Sure, me and other signers won’t mind not being able to follow.
If Gallaudet is to be inclusive, it must not exclude many of us signers who cannot hear/speak like a well-educated hearing individual can. You sound like a full-blown audist. You would be very comfortable in an administrative position at Gallaudet.
If you insist on inclusivity, then logically you would be insisting that interpreters be hired to work in classes where professors or participants can’t/refuse to use ASL. But you’d recommend that we take hearing and speech therapy instead of focusing on our education.
And as your second paragraph demonstrates, you are clearly politically naive.
f’eduped. While I can truly understand the sentiment… your posts are begining to have the “not deaf enough” ring to them….is that TRULY what it’s about to you?
Regina, that was not my intention at all. (In fact, I wish that the “not deaf enough” meme never materialized.)
I’d be perfectly happy to work with anyone who respects my native language, understands much of the language and power issues (or tries to), and acts accordingly/appropriately.
I just gotta butt in with my 2 cents here…
Nobody likes hearing this, but it’s true because I went through it myself. I came in to Gally as a non-signer, and went through the New Signer Program. It was the worst program I ever experienced in my life. They were more focused on Discovery classes than they were with teaching us ASL, and to be perfectly blunt, we mostly taught ourselves as best as we could that summer sign language because our instructors were so bad. Still, I tried to have faith and went on to the fall semester with another round of ASL classes. I ended up withdrawing because the teachers were only wanting to put us into a circle and we’re just supposed to sign among ourselves. Keep in mind this is my experience, and I have never heard to date ANYONE praising the ASL classes on campus yet. In fact, the hearing folks at other universities teach ASL so much better than Gally ever did. So if ya’ll really want to make improvements with folks knowing ASL, look no further than ASL dept.
That being said, I went through a horrible freshmen year with folks not being patient with me, or just calling me names, harrassing me, or just plain ignoring me in class when I tried to speak and sign too. I very rarely turn off my voice, and since I practiced long and hard as a child to use it, I’m not about to shut it off for nobody. However, I do sign while I speak. It’s just what comes naturally for me.
I firmly believe that people should use every resource that they can because the more they know, the more successful they will be in this world. After all, how often are you going to run into another deaf co-worker? There are also going to be times when having an interpreter is just really inconvienent. People want to talk about how hard it is for deaf folks out in the job force, and to be honest, we are our own worst enemy at times. The hearing world is not going to conform to fit us, not now or ever.
Last but not least, it would really help if the education in deaf schools were brought up to par. At least then folks would have a much better chance in the job force, and wouldn’t be so limited in their basic understanding of English and Math. And yes, deaf folks CAN learn English, whether they speak it or not. No excuse for not being fluent in it.
This, to me, is evident that the BOT & IKJ believe our compliants are invalid… They keep looking at her qualifications. However, what really is the problem here is the “attitude.” Attitude is a tangible word and it is difficult to prove. Being able to communicate with the general public as a whole is a skill a leader must have. JFK evidently didn’t show that she was capable of leading with open communication during her tenure as a provost. Why was there a “no-confidence” vote by faculty in 2000? They already do not trust her because she leads by intimidation.(I read some anecdotes in trimming the fern website and from this webblog http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=tactilejunkie.) Based on what I’ve seen during this week, she exhibited patronizing attitude. “Those deaf people think this & that..” Jordan is guilty of doing the same thing.
Just by having qualifications, which I admit are impressive, is not enough to “move” people. By “moving” people, no amount of charisma is enough. There has to be trust and respect on both sides. There’s no respect by fac/staff towards JKF BECAUSE she doesn’t respect their opinion or wishes.
Does Jane have admin credentials? She has the degree but not the knowledge on how to LEAD properly.
On the other side, I think McDonnell probably has a point… we need to look at where most of the fundings come from. I don’t know the numbers or facts– just speculations. Deaf organizations don’t have money, so most of the money probably came from organizations that endorses oralism or share afflications with AGB. As sad as it may be, we probably do need those oralists or audists on BOT…
Am curious what the mood is right now in the tent.
Where are Paul Singleton and Jeff Rosen? Their tails are under their buttocks. They go no where except bars.
insult what for?
Paul and Jeff were caught flat-footed and outmaneuvered in a classic chess strategem when you have to look several steps ahead. So much for their “leadership” and “advice.”
“deaf and hard of hearing people” is too vague. If they are all ASL signers, call them ASL signers.
And get rid of that slogan “unity for gallaudet”, pretty please?
WEll SAID!
Oh boy - after reading all this stuff, it’s now crystal clear to me that IKJ and JKF were right when they said it’s about Deaf identity, and that she wasn’t “Deaf enough”!
You protesters are ******* hypocrites!
I had several conversations with the protestors. Someone express disgust that Jane K is selfish for putting her two children and husband through all of this and that if she really cared about her family, she have resigned. It is very gender biased to wonder what kind of wife or mother Jane K. is. People wouldnt say the same thing about IKJ, I have never seen anyone complaining about President Bush raising his two daughters and being a husband during the Iraq war. I think that the reaction to Jane k would have been profoundly different had she been a MAN. You dont complain about a man not saying HI. You dont complain about a man being raised mainstreamed. You dont complain about a man looking like an ice princess. If Jane K was a man, you would have said that he is a distinguished looking man who is an iron fisted hard working person with ambitious goals for Gallaudet. Although many of us dont see it now, but thirty years later you all will say, “Gee, we just bashed a Deaf woman and it is in the history books forever.” Thats an embarrassing chapter. Shame on Deaf Women United for not standing up for her.
On another topic regarding Jane K. Many of the protestors are still complaining that Jane K. is not Deaf centric and does not fit in Deafhood movement. Check Genie Gertz’s video on http://www.joeybaer.com. Ms. Gertz clarified what Deafhood means. It is a process that includes everyone in the Deaf community. This process certainly includes Jane K. as a DEAF WOMAN. She is one of us, whether we like it or not. She is going through her own Deafhood process like we all are. I suspect she learned tremendously about what we want for Gallaudet. Lets give her the benefit of doubt to see if she meets our expectations. And our expectations have to be realistic. We cannot set her up for failure out of revenge. That would be self defeating for everyone at Gallaudet.
Since day one, I rooted for Ron Stern. Now that BoT has made its decision, I am willing to take the high road and work with Jane K because I care so much about Gallaudet. I also care very much about the Deaf community. The folks who are finger pointing and crying like babies are getting annoying. We need to stop PICKING on each other and start PICKING up the pieces of damages we all are accountable for. This includes Andy Lange who “barfed” behind Jane’s back during the graduation ceremony. Andy Lange is NAD President and I know he would NEVER do this childish behavior to Jane if she was a man.
Give Jane a break!
Andy Lange “barfed” behind JK? Wow! I think the NAD members should write letters to NAD about that, and demand Andy Lange be impeached for unprofessional behavior! If not, then I think they should quit NAD!
I stand corrected. I got several emails about Andy barfing. I checked the pictures for myself. Those comments were WRONG. People need to be careful about what they say. I should have check