By Ben Moore

Throw me a bone. Pretend for a minute that you passionately believe that the presidential search process at Gallaudet University is flawed and it’s absolutely non-negotiable that it be redone, since this blog isn’t about the protest’s rationale per se but rather tactics a large of group of students recently resorted to: seize a major academic building before eventually locking down the campus.

Since Tent City first folded last spring and until last Thursday, when students disrupted building naming ceremonies, the protest had been civil. You continued to voice your opinions through various avenues, such as writing editorials for the Buff and Blue school newspaper and letters to the administration and the Board of Trustees.

If you kept this up, you’d lose.

100% guaranteed.

Do you really honestly think it’s possible to win simply by politely expressing your displeasure to the administration and the Board of Trustees?

I remember reading an interesting article written by somebody who had experienced scores of protests during his lifetime. He had been involved with successful and unsuccessful protests and he noted differences between them.

What kind of protests consistently fail, according to him? Picketing, letter-writing, chanting, and the such. The Powers That Be tune them out. Eventually the demonstrators get bored and leave, satisfied with the cathartic experience.

What about media attention? Actually, when people read or hear about demonstrations, they feel good because it affirms that they’re living in a wonderful country with freedom of speech. They say, “Look at the wheels of democracy churning along merrily.” Then they get on with their lives. Nothing is really accomplished.

What’s effective? You probably can guess where this is going. Actions that directly throw a wrench into the machinery of status quo.

What if Americans in 1776 simply complained about the English monarchy? What if the northerners simply whined in 1861 about slavery? What if African Americans simply grumbled and moaned in 1955 about Jim Crow laws?

Imagine how the Deaf President Now movement would have turned out if the campus stayed open and students simply picketed on Florida Avenue? All in probability, the media would have solemnly reported some students were disappointed with the selection of a hearing president. Then they would’ve been eventually forgotten and faded from the public consciousness.

If we’re to win without compromising our objective, we’re absolutely required to escalate. That’s reality.

Obviously the lockdown is causing inconvenience for a lot of people. Unfortunately, fights for change are almost universally messy.

I don’t know what proportion of students support the building takeover and the lockdown, but it’s clear that an overwhelming majority of the faculty and students are opposed to Dr. Fernandes’ appointment.

Consider some facts:

  • 83% of the undergraduates deemed her unacceptable in a poll last spring
  • the faculty voted to express no confidence in her by a ratio of about 2 to 1 (I learned that the ballot was secret so there was no undue influence from the peers)
  • the student congress all but unanimously passed a motion to not recognize Dr. Fernandes as the 9th president (this congress is quite diverse, representating every organization, from Rainbow Society to Black Deaf Students Union)

Essentially, they are flexing their power by numbers right now.

So is the cause legitimate? That is worth another blog.

Ben Moore is a senior at Gallaudet University.


© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.