“Brokeback Mountain” is a gay movie. No ifs, ands, or buts. There’s some hot and heavy man-on-man kissing with the most beautiful line of spittle since Winona Ryder kissed Christian Bale in Little Women. There’s homosexual sex. There’s even - sadly - male prostitution. And of course, pervading every little crack and nuance of the film available, there’s layers upon layers of homophobia, both actual and self-perceived.
You can argue all you want about how the movie isn’t really a gay movie but really one that has universal appeal. You can argue about how people, both gay and straight, can relate to a story that isn’t actually about homosexuality, but about forbidden love. But there’s no escaping the fact that this is a gay movie about two gay men who happen to work in one of the most un-gay-friendly occupations in an area of the country that’s arguably still the most un-gay-friendly today. How many times do I have to say the word gay?
Now, what’s wrong with still saying the movie has universal appeal and relatable themes? Absolutely nothing. In just about every article or critique I’ve read, both before and after seeing the movie, there are arguments that either it’s a gay movie or that it’s a human interest movie (the implication, of course, being that it’s okay for this movie to be considered “mainstream” if you don’t focus too much on two guys kissing). Dude, wake up. It’s both. Yes, that’s entirely possible.
If there’s not one gay bone in your body, this movie still applies to you. Case in point: both cowboys end up married to women. These women are hurt, of course, by the lie these two concoct in trying to conform to our society’s expectation of them. So are the children they bear with these women.
Next time you think you have absolutely nothing to do with homosexuality, think about all the gay or transgender people you know (or don’t realize you know). And yes, unless you’re living under a rock, gay people are around you. And no, try as you might to convince yourselves you can, you cannot choose to avoid people of varying orientations.
What messages do you send that tells them they’re wrong, abnormal, or don’t deserve to live their lives pursuing their own dreams? When you say to somebody that you believe they weren’t born gay, but chose to be “that way,” aren’t you alienating them? Aren’t you hurting them, telling them they can’t be the way they are without some sacrifice (namely, your acceptance and your wholehearted respect)? When you go to the voting booths and support bans on gay marriage or unions, aren’t you violating another person’s civil right to choose to legally be with somebody they love? Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, my ass.
Or, conversely, think about all the homophobic people you know. Y’know, the ones who think, like one family member I’m very close to, that it’s okay to see some guy wearing a tight t-shirt (a trend, which, by the way, is not solely reserved for gay use) and holler out that he’s queerer than a three-dollar bill. Or the ones who profess to love every brother and sister because it’s written in the bible to do so… and then will turn around and hurt, demean, or oppress the same brother or sister because they’re gay and therefore apparently sinning. Love is patient, love is kind… not.
When you laugh along with the jokes or even say nothing, aren’t you saying it’s okay to label gay people weird? Aren’t you committing the worst kind of disrespect, relegating someone to an inferior position for no good reason?
If my daughter ever comes home and tells me she’s going to spend the rest of her life with another woman who rocks her world, I want her to tell me with the same sense of anticipation and excitement as I had when I told my mother I was getting married. The last thing I want her to experience is fear and anxiety and wondering whether she’ll lose respect or be kicked out of my life or anyone else’s. But that, unfortunately is happening to other people, even now, after Brokeback Mountain has been released.
Was this country ready for Brokeback Mountain? The plethora of gay jokes and comics (like in the Boondocks, for example) and the notorious banning of showing BBM in certain places says it wasn’t, not entirely. But man, did this country need this movie.
We’re at the point where we’re no longer arguing whether gay people deserve any legal rights, but how much legal recognization they deserve. It is my wholehearted hope that this movie will provide the momentum that we all need to make us think. And think hard enough to bring this issue entirely out into the open.
During the viewing of the movie, I could see several people, male and female, gay and straight, fidgeting nervously during slightly homoerotic scenes. But no one batted an eyelash when Ennis (Heath Ledger) bedded his wife (real-life girlfriend Michelle Williams) much more graphically than he bedded Jack (Jake Gyllenhaal). And these people are no strangers to gay issues. That tells me this is still brand-new territory, even for the people, gay or straight or somewhere in between, who are fighting for and dreaming of the day when gay is a-okay and we don’t have to be careful anymore.
Now, this is one gorgeously photographed movie. An amazing portrayal of enforced loneliness just because the world wasn’t a little friendlier. A little slow (how many montages of herded sheep can a person stand?!), but beautiful to look at. Heath Ledger did a gorgeous job of portraying somebody who didn’t want to be who he was or want what he wanted. The emotional tension between the gay characters and their families had me gripping my armrests.
But BBM has its weaknesses too. I did not understand the jump from co-workers to lovers. Sorry. I did not see the attraction, the build-up. I just saw a slam-bang surprise consummation and then a frantic attempt to not really be attracted to each other. I did not appreciate Jake Gyllenhaal’s immature portrayal of a reckless lover (although I absolutely loved his performance during the “boys should watch football” scene with his character’s overbearing father-in-law). I didn’t understand completely the motivation behind just about anybody’s actions. Overall, the emotional landscape of the movie left me wanting.
But it was well enough done to have me (and many others) crying at the end of the movie. That’s the true brunt of its universal appeal, that a movie about an issue that people still call perverse today can bring you to tears.
And I hope the movie’s well enough done to impact our world today. Racism is alive and well, but we’ve had enough dialogue on the issue that people of all races can vote, can marry who they choose (except for someone of the same sex), can own property, and so forth. In short, somebody who isn’t white can walk around for the most part without fear. We’ve also had enough dialogue on feminist issues that a battered woman can now speak up (hopefully, anyway), and not be poo-pooed.
Just this morning in class I had a classmate announce that “Faggots drink chai tea.” Now the guy he said that to is determined never to order chai tea again. And no one (including myself, unfortunately) said a damn thing.
We very obviously haven’t talked enough that my gay friends can go out and hold hands or give their partner a peck on the lips in public (in most places, anyway) like I do with my husband without fear of being attacked, either verbally or physically. We haven’t talked enough that my friends are even willing to consider trying.
They’re too afraid. Afraid of whom?!
Afraid of all the people who are afraid of them.
Every one of the arguments against allowing legal gay unions that I’ve heard has to do with respecting the sanctity or tradition of marriage or family. I translate that as fear of change or difference. That’s the same attitude that killed any chance Ennis and Jack had at happiness.
So, yeah. Just because Brokeback Mountain is a gay movie doesn’t mean it’s not for you to see. Just because an issue has to do with gay people doesn’t mean it doesn’t concern you. Pretty much, if you’re alive, it does.
Even though I wasn’t so wowed by Brokeback Mountain cinema-wise, I was wowed by its potential cultural impact. Now, if we can just get a movie made about gay NFL players made…
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.
17 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



I think it’s a marketing ploy myself. There’s a lot of people WON’T go and see it because it’s about gays. Let’s face it Hollywood has run out of blockbusters, so needed a new ‘angle’, Hollywood ’social responsibility’ ? come on ! I’m betting they DON’T do many more…..
I’ve no interest in gays or gay issues, why on earth would I pay to see two men kissing (Or two women)? One cinema on the UK mainland was reported to be offering TWO entrances to see the film, in case those who wanted to watch the film, didn’t get seen going in, and became worried THEY would be viewed gay too, defeats the point I would have thought.
Well, I haven’t seen BBM yet, am wiating for the DVD with captions.
Having said that, this isn’t the first Gay feature by the director of BBM. He had made one Gay feature called THE WEDDING BANQUET, which is a real bonza of a movie. Well worth watching.
Anyway, as per usual,whenever there’s a Gay themed movie, out come the general ignoramus and rabble rousers, and us Gays and Lesbians have to endure yet another round of prejudicial codswollop.
But funny the second paragraph in MM’s post… I actually make decisions NOT TO SEE movies, that portray the enduring timelessness of the heterosexual union .. and what movies aren’t preoccupied with that.
I’m often leftw odnerign what is the point of some of the films I see? The boy gets the girl or the girl gets the boy?And this,MM,is itself a marketing ploy… let’s go one step further, and say that heterosexuality, is itself a marketing ploy to get people to kow tow to some perceived normalcy.
It gets boring.. I know how straights live, let alone do it! I live with them everyday of my life. I wanna see my life validated on the silver screen for once…..
Mm, You prove my point beautifully, thanks. The movie isn’t as much about “two men kissing” as it is about how its so oppressive living in a world full of people who claim to “have no interest in gay issues.”
Things aren’t gonna get better for anyone until the people who promote this policy of segregation realize that gay issues do, in fact, concern every single person on this earth.
Gay issues, after all, are in large part caused by or exacerbated by people who refuse to have anything to do with them.
First things first. congratulations and thank you rob and team for putting together this VERY interesting website. it jumps with personality!
great blog. this girl is smart. Share many of the same sentiments. I saw bbm in sydney a few weeks ago. gorgeous film and different of course. my only beef with the film was that i needed to see more romance between the two protagonists… more scenes like the dozy embrace by the campfire at the end.
so what i really want to know is this. why the hell is rob still single?!
i feel so relieved that i’m not the only one who wasn’t so wowed by this movie, ha.. i totally agree with each and every point you had made here! the timeline of the movie was just sped up too fast, i think, with some scenes insufficiently elaborated.. but the cultural impact it may have on this country, yeah…
Very well written- I always enjoy reading your posts.
I wonder if somebody has written anything comparing Brokeback Mountain with the Passion? After all, both movies generated tons of discussion from bloggers across the spectrum… for reasons that are MORE similiar than different.
You mentioned “dialogue”, which means that both sides of the coin should be heard. Here, we’re basically seeing only one side of the “debate” (if there is even a such thing as that in the first place). I received an e-mail from a friend who happens to be a devoted Christian… He did not agree with much of the praise surrounding this movie, and I feel strongly that he (or anybody) should be allowed to share his opinion freely on this public forum (maturely, of course).
Yes, I think that gay people are oppressed everywhere - but I also think that in order to carry out our tenets of freedom, we need to practice them fully. That means allowing full dialogue anywhere on any sensitive topics (such as gay marriage, affirmative action, etc.) because whether you like it or not, a very large percentage of Americans do not agree with your post. And even if their views supposedly fall within the “majority” and “oppress” all other smaller perspectives, they still are owed a turn at the table.
I read Julie’s comments repeatedly because I dunno if I was offended or not. Maybe I was piqued more than offended. So many things ran through my mind.
Julie said:
“Yes, I think that gay people are oppressed everywhere - but I also think that in order to carry out our tenets of freedom, we need to practice them fully.”
Whose tenets of freedom? Exactly what freedom is that, even if it oppresses others, (intentional or not)?
So, if everyone is owed a turn at the table and the majority still decides on something that oppresses others, is that “oh well, too bad for you” to minorities? That’s it? Leave it at that? That’s the problem, the majority are still treating others like they’re not fully human and they are human just like the rest of us.
Perhaps, we should stop worrying about what everyone else is thinking or reacting (”a very large percentage of Americans…”). We should be looking into ourselves and figure out why we are reacting a certain way, such as oppressing others from loving whomever they love and forcing them to live a certain way, among other things.
…just thought I’d throw in my little 2 cents at the table…
Excellent comments, Julie and Larry both. I agree with you.
I do think we need to talk this to death before anything will come of it. We don’t do this enough — most of what I’ve seen is political grandstanding on both sides of the issue, and it looks like those who disagree with my views are making the most progress in the legal arena (case in point, recent rewording of the gay marriage ban in Virginia). This isn’t real dialogue.
I suspect it’ll be tough to ever listen to the other side. For one side, accepting dialogue means having to hear people say a very part of your self is wrong and should not be tolerated or should be relegated to second-class citizenship. This is very wrong and actually represents opression itself. For the other side (I’m guessing here, since this is the side I disagree with), it means having your values and your vision of right and wrong challenged and questioned, which is always tough and scary to do.
So, yes, the other side of the coin should be heard. The hard part is forcing ourselves to listen.
Otherwise, no real progress will be made and we’ll continue to divide ourselves.
Larry, I sincerely hope that you weren’t offended by my post; I was referring mainly to “freedom of speech”. In no way whatsoever did I mean that the majority should “decide” anything- more rather, I just believe strongly that everybody needs to have an equal voice- regardless of whether they’re right or wrong.
Like Allison says, the hard part is forcing ourselves to listen. Progress comes only with dissent- and that cannot happen if you don’t first understand your enemy thoroughly.
Sure, Julie, we should be able to debate both sides of all issues. But that is hard to do when certain Christians are not willing to discuss their religion and its faults.
Is it okay to talk about how the Bible really is not the true word of Jesus Christ, but really those of men who followed him several hundred years later? Picking and choosing texts that they wanted included.
Is it okay to talk about how Christianity has perpetuated genocide of various cultures and continues to be used to oppress women and minorities?
Is it okay to talk about how the leaders of the Christian church have forgotten the true passion of Jesus, that of showing kindness and helping others, and not condemning and being a hypocrite?
Are you ready to look your religion in the mirror and ask the true hard questions?
First, I should apologize to Allison for that post. She is trying to create a better world where all sides can live in peace. My post only added to the vitriol. In my defense, it’s just hard to feel like you are constantly being attacked by people who don’t even know you.
With that said, I also found this interesting excerpt from the Bible. I am so glad that people now can see how wrong it is. Perhaps one day, people will also see how the Bible was wrong about slavery, anti-miscegenation laws, treatment of women and homophobia. Heck, people now eat shellfish and clothing of mixed fabrics, so people do grow more enlightened. :)
“Whosoever … hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God. For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous, Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded, Or crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken; No man that hath a blemish of the seed of Aaron the priest shall come nigh to offer the offerings of the LORD made by fire: he hath a blemish; he shall not come nigh to offer the bread of his God. … Only he shall not go in unto the vail, nor come nigh unto the altar, because he hath a blemish; that he profane not my sanctuaries.” — Leviticus 21:17-2
Curtis, I would love to see a Christian come online and respond to your many questions (in a mature and respectful manner); I think that these are very good questions. That’s what I mean by having an open debate- nothing less.
In the past, I have noticed that Christians rely solely on the Bible as their source, but that can nullify the argument for agnostics and athiests if they don’t believe in the same source. Just as we ought to give ‘freedom of religion’ to Christians, we also need to allow ‘freedom of no religion’. And the latter does not necessarily apply to gays; I know many who are still deeply religious and spiritual, no matter what the denomination is.
Thanks for replying, Julie.
I truly hope that the Christian community can have this internal discussion. I think it would be very enlightening. However, I am not that optimistic. Even among differing denomination there is a degree of mistrust. It really amazes me how two people can share 95% of the same beliefs, but yet be willing to attack one another over the remaining 5%. It’s like the Shia and Sunni Muslims in Iraq right now. They should be brothers because they are all Islamists, but yet they are willing to kill each other because it is not the right kind of Muslim.
This type of intolerance needs to end or humanity will never live in peace.
What it comes down to is did this film succeed at telling its story? For me it did. As for the gay thing, I don’t want to be treated as less than human because I am gay any more than I would want my friend to be treated as less than because he is deaf. This is a great site by the way, even though you have a writer who consistently disparages fat people. For me, that kind of behavior, homophobia, ableism, racism, sexism is all the same.
Is anyone discussing how the wives in this film were treated? Were the wives simply cardboard stand-ins for relationships in the lives of these men? Weren’t there possibilities for the guys to open up about their ambivalence - showing honesty to their wives? What about their children? How were their relationships with the children limited due to their inner conflicts and secrecy about their deep love for one another? Could these two men have found some kind of courage within themselves? WIthin their families? Was the sad ending entirely the fault of the outside community?
finally, someone i can whole heartedly agree with. Chris, thank you for pionting out the obviose that so many people missed!!!!!
Phentermine
Phentermine Online Casinos phentermine