My uncle forwarded me this New York Times article about young John Cave Jr., a deaf student, who wanted to bring his service dog, Simba, to school. There is a cute picture of a Simba, a yellow Labrador, in the article.
To summarize: the Nassau County school said no to the Cave family, “concluding that having a dog in school would provide no instructional benefit to the student, and could pose a health risk to students with severe allergies and create safety issues during fire drills and practice lockdowns.”
The case made its way to the New York Division on Human Rights, where Commissioner Kumiki Gibson “found that students with disabilities were entitled to have a service dog with them in school under state law and ordered the East Meadow district to change its policy immediately.”
Due to the vagaries of state law, this policy hasn’t been put into effect yet because of an appeal to the State Supreme Court, but so far, so good. I’m happy with the Commissioner’s decision. Of course, schools should allow students with disabilities to bring their guide dogs to class. I do not dispute that.
My problem is: why does John Cave need a guide dog in school? His mother, Nancy, points out that he uses cochlear implants and that Simba accompanies “her son almost everywhere, alerting him to sounds he cannot hear, like fire alarms or someone calling his name.”
Millions of deaf children, including me, went to school and survived just fine without guide dogs. Fire alarms are a no-brainer. Everyone in the classroom runs for the door, so follow ‘em. Sure, it’s a little confusing, but so what?
My friend just said, “Just because it’s legal doesn’t mean it’s the right choice.” Exactly.
There are lots of great adaptions John Cave could take advantage of. Teach people to tap on his shoulder if they need his attention. Tell the teacher she can wave her hand. Being deaf means learning those adaption skills and educating others on how to work with deaf people.
Instead, John “outsources” those skills and depends on his service dog. It’s just smacks of a very deaf=disability perspective. When I’m in a class, the last thing I think about is how people will get my attention or what I will do in a fire alarm. I’m sorry, but I just can’t see any vital use for Simba in the classroom. Can someone tell me?
I also can’t help but wonder if John Cave’s real problem are over-protective parents; you will see that the picture in the article shows him wearing a medical bracelet. As my friend said, “I hope to god it doesn’t just say ‘DEAF’ and instead lists some other serious medical condition.”
This situation troubles me. I do understand everyone is entitled to their own choice of accommodations. I know many deaf people and families have hearing dogs at home.
But what kind of humanistic message does having a guide dog in school send to John, his family, his classmates, and the school? Discuss.
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.
28 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



“John Cave’s mother, Nancy, said that her son, who has cochlear implants, was trained to handle the dog and that air filters could be installed for students with allergies.”
There’s some truth to your theory about overprotective and ignorant parents. Note that she said how “John was trained”, not that the “dog was trained”. Where’s the dignity here?
Re. “training” the owner or the dog: it applies to both.
When I had a hearing dog, the agency told me I had to stop depending on flashing lights and learn to depend on the dog for these sounds; otherwise the dog would eventually ignore them. It was difficult to overcome a lifetime of depending on electricity, however, and I never did quite succeed.
There is a point to learning to depend on living and functional ears. It just didn’t work out for me, though.
dianrz; a deaf person “trained” not to look at flashing ilghts? wow… i’m stunned.
http://sreedhari.sulekha.com/m.....lt/dog.JPG
Now THIS is a real service dog.
Dude, that’s no training dog; THIS is a Guide animal. Boo-ya!
——–> http://www.google.com/imgres?i.....e&cd=3
sorry, i meant this link:
http://fig.cox.miami.edu/~cmal.....n.blue.jpg
lol!
Off the point - but imagine if there were more than 20 deaf students who happened to attend Cave’s school and because of this law, every one of these 20 students are permitted to bring their own service dogs. This would have created a problem for both students and the school administration. I just think this is silly.
Ooh - now that I have thought about it - let me step out and buy myself a toy poodle. Be right back.
Funny. Pound Puppies?
But in all seriousness, you used the reductio ad absurdum fallacy here. There’s no evidence such a thing would happen.
And if it did, it’s the school’s problem to figure it out. Just like schools have to figure out what to do with 20 deaf third graders, or 1,000 deaf college students.
I’d presume that medical alert bracelet probably states no MRI’s or some other relevant medical information. (I would hope so anyhow!)
It may seem a bit extreme to insist upon having a hearing dog accompany John to a school that apparently is well equipped to meet the needs of their hoh/deaf population but if it falls within the eyes of the law as a reasonable accommodation, it should be honored. I suppose that if the dog has dual roles as a guide dog part of the day and a house pet at home while John’s in school it could cause some confusion. I say that while it seems unnecessary to some of us who are more comfortable with our deafness, it appears to be something he feels strongly enough about to have battled for over a year, so live and let live.
One thing I didn’t say in my blog was at the end of the article:
“Paul J. Margiotta, the family’s lawyer, said on Monday that the family planned to file a state lawsuit against the district within a week, claiming $150 million for violation of civil rights.”
$150 million!?!?!?! Why would the family want to take away $150 million from a SCHOOL DISTRICT that is educating their child and thousands other?
that was for punitive damages. its not the school system that’ll pay for whatever; its our tax money.
Correction; our SSI money.
The judge dismissed their lawsuit. An update to this story can be found at: http://www.alldeaf.com/america.....ool-2.html I couldn’t find a link to the original article, so I don’t know the date of this article.
This story is troubling to me. I agree with Adam when he submits that “Being deaf means learning those adaption skills and educating others on how to work with deaf people.” Reasonable accomodations do not necessarily mean that one has to be happy with said accomodations - in this case, the dog serves no useful educational purpose and there are teachers, interpreters, notetakers, other students who could alert John to fire alarms, etc. Relying on a dog for this does not make him any more “independent” than he would otherwise be.
Well, so much for the CI benefiting this young man!
I will write a blog posting about the real absurdity of the ADA law why it is really a bad law in many ways.
I am totally agree with you about why the Cave family want to take $150 million dollars from the educational system.
How sad about our American society being overligtatious!
Robert L. Mason (RLM)
I wonder why none of deaf students would bring their guide dogs to any state school for the deaf…..
Hmmm, they will have pit bull fighting lesson in the P.E. class.
Now that New York has a Blind governor, I’ll bet the school district works to settle this lawsuit, instead of fighting it. I agree this is a complete waste of taxpayer dollars, but the school district has no chance now…
I’m familiar with East Meadow School District and the Cave family. I don’t know about now, but the middle school that John attended a couple years ago has a program for deaf students. The majority of deaf/hoh students in the school were in self-contained classes. John was mainstreamed for most of the day (I think).
I don’t know whether he’s at the high school with the deaf program or if he’s at another school. I’m very curious to know which school he’s attending.
Doesn’t ADA require the school system to install fire alarms that have flashing lights and so on?
It seems to me that the parents went around it the wrong way… They should’ve sued the schools for not being compliant with ADA in terms of technology.
I remember in high school, a deaf student began bringing her deaf guide dog. we were all confused because she’s had that dog for several years and she was getting on fine without it. apparently the agency that trained the dog threatened to take the dog away if she didn’t use it 24/7. that was over 10 years ago, so i’m hazy on details.
being a devil’s advocate here - if you’re in an area where there’s not much technical and repairs support, it might be beneficial to have the dog to balance it out.
I read about this when it occurred, and I am still dumbfounded by this whole ordeal! I was one of the first “severely HOH students” mainstreamed in a pilot program in NYC’s public school system. The ONLY help I ever received, in addition to my hearing aids, was a weekly visit from a “speech teacher” who actually tutored me and ran interference when necessary with teachers who insisted that I “be placed in an institution.” To this date, I still don’t depend on outside resources - indeed, I have been known to stay inside a (work) building during a firedrill, and now co-workers make sure that someone “has me” when a firedrill is sounded. But, to bring my dog to work? NO WAY! :-D So NOT FAIR to the dog, IMHO….
I found Adam’s comments about John Cave’s “guide” dog [sic] to be ignorant and uneducated. To clarify an initial point, the term “guide dog” refers to a service animal that has been trained to assist blind individuals and persons with low vision in mobility tasks. John Cave’s assistance dog, Simba, is a “hearing dog.” Sometimes called “alert dogs” or “signal dogs,” hearing dogs are specifically trained to alert their D/deaf or hard of hearing partners to different sounds.
In his post, Adam makes the gross error of assuming that all deaf students are alike or can benefit from the same things. Even though Adam and “millions of deaf children … went to school and survived just fine without guide dogs” [sic], that doesn’t negate the benefit that this particular deaf student derives from his hearing dog’s skills.
I find it particularly fascinating that he brings up the “deaf=disabled” coda in order to argue against the use of hearing dogs. Instead of using hearing dogs, Adam suggests, deaf people should instead rely on other people, presumably those who can hear, in order to make themselves aware of potentially life-threatening sounds like fire alarms or sirens. Yet if, as Adam is concerned, using a hearing dog makes deaf people appear “disabled” in the eyes of their hearing peers, I should think he would be more concerned about the passive impression a deaf person might make if he always had to follow his hearing classmates out the door during a fire alarm, or wait for people to approach him in order to get his attention. As Adam stated, “… being deaf means learning those adaption [sic] skills and educating others on how to work with deaf people.” Why must adaptation skills preclude or exclude the very viable option of using a hearing dog rather than always relying on the dependability or kindness of hearing people?
I appreciate that Adam took the time to post and share his concerns about the appropriateness of using a hearing dog’s services in the classroom. However, his post discourages, rather than invites, dialogue on this issue. I would encourage Adam and interested others to look at the website of the International Association of Assistance Dog Partners (IAADP) to view a list of sounds to which hearing dogs can be trained to alert. Most of sounds listed on this site, and many others not listed, do exist and do occur in the world beyond one’s home: http://www.iaadp.org/tasks.html
I guess there’s some truth to some of your comments; i have beef with Cochlear implant users that insist that since their Implant works for them, it should work for everyone else.
Regardless… I disagree with you with the fact that a hearing dog is needed in a classroom setting when you have an interpreter, note-taker, and an implant. This is a classic case of a candle that’s seen as a bonfire.
and that 150 million? NOT COOL! (woofs in agreement!)
I’ve watched this same debate play out on a listserv for deaf/hard of hearing individuals. As a hearing dog partner for 27 years, I am still seeing a lot of misunderstanding about the role of a hearing dog. I’d like to ask for these considerations:
1. We are not privy to the whole story, only what has played out in the media, and I’ve been told by those who know the Cave family that a lot of news accounts got details wrong.
2. We also can’t know for sure what barriers John Cave deals with. We don’t know how much the CI helps him, what classroom acoustics he contends with, etc. A CI doesn’t restore hearing (I have one). If the story was about a blind child or a child in a wheelchair, people would understand why an assistance dog would be needed and not be so quick to pass judgment. I’d like to see more support for John Cave. He’s shown a lot of grace and maturity under all kinds of pressure and bad treatment by his school administrators.
3. The need for a hearing dog goes beyond the IDEA and learning. They’re about issues of access and safety covered by the ADA. This doesn’t mean that every student who is deaf or hard of hearing should have the right to have a hearing dog in the schools. There are still other expectations, particularly that the animal be uner control and nondisruptive. But “nondisruptive” should be fair and limited to the dog’s public behavior (no inappropriate barking, jumping, etc.) and not used as an excuse by teachers or administrators who do fail to control their classrooms and hallways or to support only appropriate interaction with the dog by anyone other than the partner.
4. I have 27 years of hard experience with being questioned and often challenged about public access, not only by restaurants and airlines and stores but by hearing, deaf and hard of hearing people. I think there’s a fundamental misunderstanding about the role of the hearing dog. Having the dog with you 24 hours a day can be key to an effective partnership. Over time, each of my dogs and I have developed a rhythm as we learn each other’s abilities and idiosyncracies and build our ability to communicate. We learn different things about each other as we experience different situations. The bond and trust that is built through those shared experiences is incredible.
5. When I got my first hearing dog, a colleague reacted with dismay. “Oh Cheryl! You were always so independent!” I was completely taken aback because I have never felt so independent as I do when my hearing dog is with me. Hearing dogs can be taught to alert to any number of things, but every dedicated hearing dog partner I know will tell you that it’s not the full story. There is so much more information I get from what my dog does or does not do. I can figure out where a strange noise is coming from just by the tilt of my dog’s ears, and whether I should pay attention because her demeanor shows it’s startled her. It gives me a real and important sense of peace and security.
6. I was the only deaf student in my school throughout elementary school, high school, and college. Following a teacher was impossible and socializing was very difficult. I have heard countless times through the years that students with disabilities who have an assistance dog have found it helps them to make friends and be much less alienated. Instead of the kid who is weird and different, they’re the kid with the cool dog. I think that counts for something.
Cheryl
But one might wonder whether a hearing dog’s role is really to “make friends” for the dog’s owner. When I’ve met assistance-dog owners who were blind or had a physical disability, those owners have been diligent about fending off people who invite themselves to pet or socialize with the dog. The rationale is that the assistance dog is at work, not to be distracted by everyone who goes, “Oh, isn’t that dog cute?”
Instead, the one deaf owner of an assistance dog that I’ve known took a different approach. The owner basically used the trained hearing dog as a way to initiate amiable contact with other people. This is not inherently wrong, as far as I know, but it did not earn the owner any admiration from other deaf people who didn’t go around with a cute canine.
Does one really need a hearing dog to be the cool pooch? If a cool pooch is all that’s needed for the sake of striking up interaction between the deaf owner and hearing people, perhaps it is not proper to use a hearing dog in that capacity. And perhaps a cool pooch should not be admitted to schools as a status symbol for the deaf owner.
I have no direct knowledge of the case described in this original article, so my comments are not directed towards the people in Nassau County. This is simply a response to the last point in Cheryl’s posting.
JS,
A “cool dog” doesn’t mean a dog that’s going to play or be petted. That would be considered disruptive behavior by students, teachers, staff or administrators if done without permission of the dog’s partner. It ould also be considered disruptive if the partner allows petting without permission of the teacher, staff or administrator inappropriately, such as during a teacher’s lesson.
Most kids are only used to pets that aren’t very responsive to commands and have poor public behavior, and are fascinated by a well-trained dog’s professional behavior.
I am stopped frequently by strangers who ask if they can pet my hearing dog. I have struggled with this over time and I have found a solution that works for me. I trained my dog to go to an individual person for petting on command. If the situation is appropriate, I will give the command and point to the person who is permitted to do the petting. I give another command to call my dog back to my side when I feel things have gone on long enough.
Cheryl,
Perhaps no one knew you were deaf and most people assumed your dog was just a pet, not a guide dog?
As for a blind person, it’s pretty obvious. That person has a “blind” look on his/her face and the dog has a harness/bib.
Generally, the public already knew not to approach a blind person’s guide dog because the animal is working. Your situation is a different story.