Each one of the three finalists’ presentations is a crucial step in their bids to become the 9th president of Gallaudet University. In a 20-minute presentation, they’re to articulate their vision of Gallaudet five-to-seven years down the road.
Disclaimer: I am not a Gallaudet student, alumnus, employee, or former employee. I’ve never attended a class or a program sponsored or hosted by Gallaudet. I never heard of Dr. Stephen Weiner until last week. I only know what Dr. Jane Fernandes looks like because I saw her picture on Gallaudet’s website. The closest I ever got to meeting Ron Stern was going to the same high school prom as his son.
My point: There are hundreds of people out there with far more intimate knowledge of one or more of the other candidates. Instead of being one of those people out there, I’ll be able to approach each finalist’s presentation with a relatively objective perspective unfettered by past misdeeds.
So, I went to Dr. Weiner’s presentation yesterday afternoon. Oh, it was exciting. The auditorium filled up within two minutes. The sense of history in the room was palpable. This man, about to address us, could be our next president, the second deaf president of Gallaudet.
A hour later, I got real.
Dr. Weiner’s presentation was inspiring. The way he spoke of his pride in Gallaudet - I wished at that moment that I was a Gallaudet alumnus. He would make a great recruiter. A great provost.
But not a great president.
Dr. Weiner took nearly 40 minutes to complete his 20-minute presentation and also took a slightly bigger step, thinking ahead eight years to 2014, Gallaudet’s 150th anniversary. Touche.
He was remarkably clear. I finally felt that an administrator was speaking my language, instead of some hastily-thrown-together sign and speech combination. It was remarkable to feel that 100% communication access coming from a potential university president.
The content of his presentation, however, left much to be desired. I felt like I was at a Youth Leadership Camp workshop listening to his interpretation of the eight strategic goals rather than a clear articulation of his vision of Gallaudet at age 150. An inclusive deaf university. Okay, isn’t that already what we all want? I wanted to hear something new. Something bold.
He threw in some great gems, though. “Working at Gallaudet is not a job; it is a mission.” “We are past capital-D deaf.” “We must serve all deaf with mutual respect for all.”
Oh, and he quoted my most favorite Talmud quote ever, “He who saves one person saves the world.”
But still - I didn’t feel his vision. I’m still not sure what it was.
The oft-important quality of an university president is to make money for the school. In this case, the money comes from Congress and corporate foundations. Does he have the right stuff to work with corporate presidents, Senators, or legislative assistants? The answer to that question was clearly shown during Dr. Weiner’s question-and-answer session following his presentation.
It’s all too easy to look at I. King Jordan and see a president. He’s had the job for 18 years; of course he looks presidential. He has that august presence around him and you can’t help but be dazzled every time he enters the room.
I know I can’t expect to see that regality in any of the three finalists. Even IKJ needed some time to grow into his new pairs of shoes back in 1988. But I still wanted to see some glimmer of greatness, and I didn’t see that in Dr. Weiner.
As he was listening to each person’s question, he couldn’t stop fidgeting. His feet were doing their own dance. One time, his leg swung around. I wasn’t sure what I was watching, his shiny dress shoes or his expressive hands. And he teaches public speaking courses. A Gallaudet President cannot fidget in front of other people!
So, unfortunately, his frenzied feet just killed the whole deal for me. Also, for someone with his longevity as a Gallaudet student and employee, I was surprised at many of his answers. He didn’t have satisfactory responses for the graduate student community, for oral/mainstreamed students, or for non-traditional students. He was flying by the seats of his pants through other answers, sometimes appearing even amateurish.
That disappointed me. I expect the presidential candidate to know more about what’s going on in his campus, especially if he has a home-turf advantage.
You can tell that Dr. Weiner is a great guy just by listening to him for a few minutes. He’s proven himself to be a good dean. I’d love to get to know him better. He has so much pride in Gallaudet and its students, and I thoroughly applaud his dedication to a more inclusive deaf university.
Kudos to him for trying. That took guts. He went much, much farther than so many of his peers, and delivered a captivating presentation. The bar has been set.
Yep, he’d make a great provost. I want him to be provost. He’d be an awesome provost. But president?
Nope.
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.
21 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



wow. im amazed that you went. i did not get the opprotunity, but from what i’ve heard, several others whom attended felt the same way that you did. i knew him {Dr. Weiner}, when i went to Gally, and i was never quite impressed by him. he is passionate, and im glad you point that out. but i happen to agree with all of your points. he strikes me as rather, um… unprofesional. he is a great dean, but for President?? no. i would like someone more like IKJ….
perfectly stated.
Thus spake Zarathustra and left his cave, glowing and strong, like a
morning sun coming out of gloomy mountains.
Well, what do you think needs reform at Gallaudet? I’d like to see:
*A commitment to recruiting teachers in departments which have suffered from lack of people such as physics and other science depts.
*A commitment to encouraging the development of Deaf-centered technology
*A strategy for dealing with the coming generation of Deaf individuals most of whom will have cochlear implants - we need to find ways to continue to make Gallaudet attractive to all Deaf people.
*A commitment to exploring that “the Deaf nation may have many tribes” (if I can quote myself)
The Deaf community is changing. The direction the University will take in the next few years is crucial. We need leadership and unity. We need respect and recognition of difference while at the same time noting similarity.
Just some thoughts.
joeseph. i agree with your goals but i must add a few. such as a great president we can all have confidence in. More extensive background checks for prospective students. in order to aviod stupidity and riots. things like that.
Like POTUS, what I find intriguing about the soon to be POGU is that he or she will become not only a university president - but Deaf America’s newest icon.
Now that’s what the real hoopla is all about, people.
Your observations of Dr. Weiner’s presentation supported my earlier comments about him:
“Stephen has a doctorate in Counseling and Development. This is definitely much more related to the job position of being the President of Gallaudet than Jane’s doctorate. He also has adminstrative experience. I just checked out the gallypreswatch.com website and saw a picture of Stephen. He seems to be really laid-back which is just fine for a counselor but for a President of Gallaudet? Can he handle the political pressures, woo people to donate money to Gallaudet, use strategies to promote Gallaudet’s growth?”
I agree with you that a President should NOT fidget. I’m curious to hear about the other candidates’ presentations. =D
I am not sure if y’all agree with me, but I feel it is UNFAIR that one of the three candidates had to be the first to give a presentation (it doesn’t matter who went first, mind you) and the other two candidates have a couple of days to contemplate on what to include in their presentations.
I won’t be surprised if the other two candidates and their loved ones are now reading our comments! They will fine-tune their presentations in order to make them appear more “appealing” to the audience, of which the first candidate lacked.
I think it should have been an all day long event where the school is closed and anyone is welcome to attend.
What do you think?
I completely agree with you, Gallaudetine. It doesn’t really seem fair to allow the last two to gather intel on how to make their presentations better. Closing the campus for a whole day is probably difficult (logistically speaking), and would be made more so if the Provost, who would presumably handle the school closing, had to worry about her presentation, too.
I hope the PSC picked the order by random selection (or at least because of Ron Stern’s travel arrangements).
Thank you for your impromptu report. It’s nice to hear about what’s going on, as reported by an unbiased observer. I live roughly over 1,000 miles away from DC, and it’s nice to feel connected to the Gallaudet community, through blogging endeavors such as yours.
However, cut the fella some slack, willya? Happy feet is surely a poor indicator of success, nor would it kill presidential aspirations, no? I’m more interested about his substance, than his style.
I would be interested in reading some of his responses to the audience that day. What made his comments seem ‘unamateurish’? Were there any truly incisive comments? Etc.
To be sure, Gallaudet faces challenges in the near future, and being an alum, I’m keenly interested in the POGU process.
Thanks for providing some “objective” commentary (no commentary is every truly 100% objective, IMHO).
No other university that I’ve attended or heard of would shut down for an entire day just for a presentation by a presidential candidate. Still, I’m sure that whoever went first would have to sacrifice something in the short-term. Short of having a debate/longer forum, I don’t think there’s any easy way to resolve this.
What I’d like to know more than just the overall impression is specific answers or feelings about specific responses. For example, you said he didn’t have satisfactory responses for certain groups. What areas did he have satisfactory or outstanding remarks? Did you get the sense he could grow into the job, should he be chosen?
In any event, I look forward to your coverage (you ARE going?) of the remaining two candidates.
Here’s hoping the new president can tackle some of the student body issues facing us…Whose best qualified to do that…
David-
Nice to see you again after all those years. You might remember me. I used the nickname, the one Nietzsche made famous, in my Wassup discussions back in the days when VAX ruled. I just checked your bio at DeafDC and it brought a smile.
According to the blog title, I would have expected to see discussions about Stephen Weiner proclaiming a Superman (himself?) for the Gallaudet Presidency. :)
Hopefully there’ll be more indepth reports for the other two candidates when they have their own open forums on Gallaudet campus. I’ve read some comments on other blogging sites and have found it lacking in substance.
Some of Dr. Weiner’s comments struck me as amateurish because they basically boiled down to, “I don’t know, but we’ll ask the community and find out.”
I guess you had to be there; many of Dr. Weiner’s answers weren’t dazzling or even satisfactory. A representative from Graduate Student Association asked how grad students could be more involved in the community.
Dr. Weiner’s fumbling answer was to create mixed-use dorms for undergraduate and graduates and get SBG and GSA to work closer together. Okay…but Dr. Weiner has years and years of experience in this field; I expected a much more detailed answer.
He also didn’t seem particularly confident in what he was saying. Don’t get me wrong. I like the guy; maybe he’s just not a good debater.
i think an pen debate between the 3 candidates in a wonderful idea. it would give our community a chance to discuss all the issues we have and is a good way ti get the answers to the questions we are burnig to ask…..
Hm, a comment here made me think.
Like POTUS, what I find intriguing about the soon to be POGU is that he or she will become not only a university president - but Deaf America’s newest icon.
Now that’s what the real hoopla is all about, people.
I’m a rarity. I’m a supporter of Jane Fernandes. But, will she be seen as a Deaf icon? I can’t see that. Interesting. From what I’ve heard, Weiner’s presentation wasn’t good. I think Stern can be seen as an icon more so than JKF. Very interesting thought.
Would it be more fair if all three candidates had a chance to present at the same time, one after another? Say, in a 2 hour period? That way no candidate would have a time advantage over another candidate.
http://www.nbc4.com/education/8832479/detail.html
This looks like it was hastily written, but you get the point- 100 students held a protest. Complaining what? That Fernandes is not qualified? That Anderson did not make it as a finalist? Even though this represents only a small segment of the Gallaudet’s CURRENTLY enrolled population, the next Gallaudet President already has my deepest sympathy. It’s extremely difficult to lead against waves of irrationality built on misinformation. We do not know the full intentions behind the BoT, and nor do we know 100% of what went on behind these closed doors… but we do need to place our good faith in these members. I can understand setting up a protest should any of these candidates be outrageously unqualified (such as one never having heard of Gallaudet), but that is simply not the case here. However, if these students strongly feel that they have valid reasons, then I would like to know what other options they first exercised?
Stone responded: “Some of Dr. Weiner’s comments struck me as amateurish because they basically boiled down to, “I don’t know, but we’ll ask the community and find out.” ”
Well, here is my pov … I appreciate Weiner’s honesty that he did not know how to merge UG and Grad students at GU. “We’ll ask the community and find out” is actually a very good answer because it shows that if he were a president, he would include the community in the decision-making, which the IKJ/JKF administration lacks.
So far, the IKJ/JKF adminstration has the tendency of circumventing many important decisions, bypassed the Faculty Senate, etc and submitted to BoT for approval while everyone was out for the summer…
[…] Gallaudet’s presidential search has undoubtedly taken over the headlines. Adam’s review of Steve Weiner, Ron Stern, and Jane Fernandes, are all good reads. Several controversial topics were also raised: Bush’s potential impeachment (Bobby), censorship of network TV (Adam), tracking people via cellphones (Julie), keeping the Internet free (David), plugging away at pagers while driving (Rob), and being a Deaf ambassador (David). […]
I agree that Dr. Fernando is not qualify as new President because she is not really knowledge of deaf culture. We need right person to be new President.. I have feeling there are somoene out there to be right person to be new President.. I feel that we should vote Dr. Fernando out.. I hope someone is out there, interested to support deaf community..